Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

1996 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1996 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Damages Against Bank in Negligence and Breach of Contract Claim. Plaintiff Fails to Prove Alleged Fraud and Collusion by Bank Officials in Dishonour of Bills of Exchange and Stoppage of Cash Credit Account.

12 Mar 2015

The Plaintiff, Dileep Nevatia, sole proprietor of M/s. Sundeep Industries, filed a suit against the State Bank of India (successor to State Bank of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Employees Due to Wrong Fixation of Pay Scales. The Court held that recovery is permissible when the employee had knowledge of the error or when the mistake is a continuing wrong, and the principle of no recovery does not apply in such cases.

18 Jan 2019

The petitioners, 13 employees of Thane Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the Corporation's decision to recover excess salary pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross-Writ Petitions and Upholds Tribunal’s Compensation to Illegally Terminated Incharge Principal in Educational Trust Dispute. Termination Without Enquiry Held Illegal, but Reinstatement Denied as Post Was Temporary and a Regular Principal Had Been Appointed Under University Statutes.

9 Nov 2006

The case involved cross-writ petitions arising from the order of the College Tribunal for Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, which partly a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Contempt Petition for Lack of Prima Facie Case. Allegations of Creating Third-Party Rights and Obtaining Consent Decree Without Disclosing Pending Proceedings Do Not Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

27 Apr 2005

The case involves a criminal contempt petition filed by Dr. Ramesh D. Pandit and another (original plaintiffs) against Smt. Janabai and others (origin...

High Court

High Court Directs State to Pay Back Wages in Teacher Reinstatement Case Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules. The court held that the state government must bear the liability for back wages as per the School Tribunal's order, since the Tribunal did not specify the payer and the management had already deposited funds as directed.

23 Mar 2026

The dispute involved an education society and its college as petitioners against the State of Maharashtra and a teacher as respondents. The teacher wa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Scope Limited to Existing Adjudicated Rights. The court held that the Labour Court cannot decide new claims for benefits not awarded in the original reinstatement order, as Section 33(C)(2) is only for computation of pre-existing rights.

17 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Smt. Neeta S. Pathak, was a workman who had been reinstated with back wages by an order dated 10th April 1991. Subsequently, she filed...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor in Railway Contract Dispute — Extension of Time Granted Without Protest Bars Claim for Liquidated Damages and Interest on Delayed Payments is Allowed Under Interest Act, 1978.

7 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Union of India, acting through the Chief Electrical Engineer (Construction), Central Railway, awarded a contract to the respondent, M/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Suit of Plaintiff Coparcener Where Business Started from Ancestral Property Proceeds Constitutes Joint Family Property. Partnership Firms Run Exclusively by Family Members and Funded by HUF Nucleus Are HUF Businesses, and Plaintiff Is Entitled to Equal Share Regardless of Parental Divorce.

30 Jun 2010

The plaintiff filed a suit for partition claiming a 1/20th share in properties alleged to belong to the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) of his grandfathe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — No Fraud or Collusion Found in Consent Terms Filed by Counsel. Consent decree upheld as valid and binding under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Dhanaji Kashinath Shendkar and others, filed writ petitions challenging a consent decree passed in a suit for specific performance. T...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Question of Excepted Clauses in Government Contracts to Larger Bench — High Court Erred in Relying on Bharat Drilling Without Analyzing Contractual Clauses. The issue of whether prohibitory claim clauses bind the Arbitral Tribunal requires authoritative determination by a larger bench.

5 Dec 2025

The State of Jharkhand appealed against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which allowed a Section 37 appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliat...

138 139 140 141 142

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)