Search Results for "Rule 11-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Rule 11-A"

350 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 350 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Karikho Kri in Election Dispute Over Non-Disclosure of Vehicles and Dues — High Court's Declaration of Void Election Set Aside. Non-disclosure of vehicles registered in names of dependent wife and son does not amount to corrupt practice under Section 123(2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and improper acceptance of nomination under Section 100(1)(d)(i) requires proof that election was materially affected.

9 Apr 2024

The case arises from an election petition challenging the election of Karikho Kri, the returned candidate from 44 Tezu (ST) Assembly Constituency in A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Conductor in UPSRTC Case — Domestic Inquiry Defect Cured by Employer Evidence, But Tribunal's Appreciation of Evidence Not Perverse. The Court held that the Tribunal's finding that the inspector was not proved to have inspected the bus was a plausible appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

8 Dec 2021

The appeal arose from an order of the Allahabad High Court which upheld the Industrial Tribunal's decision reinstating a conductor of the Uttar Prades...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project — Acquisition Proceedings Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Make Award Within Two Years from Declaration Under Section 6 Renders Proceedings Lapsed.

6 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Smt. Nilima Mahesh Bhole, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking quashment of land acquisition ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Upa-Lokayukta Recommendation in Disciplinary Matter — Procedural Fairness Required When Disagreeing with Inquiry Officer. Upa-lokayukta cannot disagree with inquiry officer's findings without providing opportunity of hearing; disciplinary authority must follow natural justice before differing from inquiry officer or Upa-lokayukta.

24 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Sri Shankarappa, an employee of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), challenged the recommendation dated 16.01.20...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Canal Construction Due to Lapse Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Make Award Within Two Years from Section 6 Declaration Renders Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed.

16 Nov 2016

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Bolegaon and Hirerogi villages, Indi Taluka, Vijayapura District, challenged the land acquisition pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

30 Mar 2015

The petitioners, landowners of Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza Gondia (Bk), challenged the reservation No. S169 in the Final D...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses MSRTC's Challenge to Labour Court Award in Conductor Misappropriation Case — Proportionality of Punishment Upheld. Labour Court's order reinstating conductor as fresh appointee for misappropriation of Rs.36.80 under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, confirmed as not perverse.

18 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the award of the Labour Court, Ahmednagar, dated 8.10.2000 in Referen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Declaring Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Award Not Made Within Two Years of Final Declaration. Failure to Comply with Mandatory Time Limit Under Section 11A Results in Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings for Land in Sy.No.44/2 at Yelechenahalli Village.

28 Feb 2013

The petitioner, K L Ramesh, claiming to be the owner of land measuring 3 acres 9 guntas in Sy.No.44/2 at Yelechenahalli Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Ba...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compensation Award in Railway Misconduct Case — Tribunal Cannot Grant Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement When Enquiry Is Valid and Misconduct Proved. The Court held that under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Tribunal cannot award compensation in lieu of reinstatement when the domestic enquiry is valid and the workman is found guilty of misconduct.

5 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Divisional Railway Manager, South Western Railway, Hubli, challenged the award dated 03.09.2007 passed by the Central Government Indus...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Revenue's Appeal in MVAT Penalty Case — Section 61(2) Does Not Permit Reduction of Penalty Below Statutory Rate. The court held that once a penalty is imposed under Section 61(2) of the MVAT Act, the quantum must be exactly one tenth per cent of total sales, with no discretion to reduce.

15 Sep 2011

The Revenue appealed against a decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal reducing a penalty imposed under Section 61(2) of the Maharashtra Value ...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)