Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 86
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, landowners of Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza Gondia (Bk), challenged the reservation No. S169 in the Final Development Plan of Gondia Town, which reserved their lands for a shopping complex and vegetable market. The Final Development Plan was published on 24.08.1984 under Section 31 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act). The petitioners sought a declaration that the reservation had lapsed and that they were free to use the land as per the adjacent user. The court noted that no acquisition proceedings had been initiated within the prescribed period of 10 years from the date of the plan. Relying on Section 127 of the MRTP Act, the court held that the reservation had lapsed and the landowners were entitled to use the land in accordance with the adjacent user. The court allowed the petition, setting aside the reservation and declaring that the petitioners could develop the land as per the adjacent user.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Reservation Lapse - Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Land reserved for shopping complex and vegetable market in Final Development Plan published on 24.08.1984 - No acquisition proceedings initiated within 10 years - Held that reservation lapses and landowners are entitled to use land as per adjacent user (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation of land for a shopping complex and vegetable market under the Final Development Plan has lapsed due to non-acquisition within the prescribed period, and whether the landowners are entitled to use the land as per the adjacent user.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, setting aside the reservation No. S169 and declaring that the petitioners are entitled to use the land as per the adjacent user.

Law Points

  • Reservation lapse after 10 years
  • Section 127 MRTP Act
  • deemed lapse
  • right to use land as per adjacent user
  • failure to acquire within prescribed period
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (03) 133

Writ Petition No. 4724 of 2013

2015-03-30

B. P. Dharmadhikari, A.P. Bhangale

Mr. A.A. Naik for Petitioners, Mr. A.S. Fulzele for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, Mr. A. Parihar for Respondent No.4

Mohandas s/o Sadhuram Tahiliani and others

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging reservation of land in Final Development Plan

Remedy Sought

Setting aside reservation No. S169 and declaration that petitioners are free to use land as per adjacent user

Filing Reason

Non-acquisition of land within prescribed period under MRTP Act

Issues

Whether the reservation of land for shopping complex and vegetable market has lapsed due to non-acquisition within 10 years from the date of Final Development Plan? Whether the landowners are entitled to use the land as per the adjacent user after lapse of reservation?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that no acquisition proceedings were initiated within 10 years from publication of Final Development Plan on 24.08.1984, hence reservation lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Respondents did not contest the lapse but argued that the land should be used as per the adjacent user.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, if land reserved in a final development plan is not acquired within 10 years from the date of the plan, the reservation lapses and the landowner is entitled to use the land as per the adjacent user.

Judgment Excerpts

Final development plan under Section 31 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 for Gondia Municipal Town was published on 24.08.1984, and in it, the lands of petitioners were reserved for shopping complex and vegetable market. In the present matter, the reservation has lapsed and the petitioners are entitled to use the land as per the adjacent user.

Procedural History

The Final Development Plan was published on 24.08.1984. No acquisition proceedings were initiated within 10 years. The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 4724 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the reservation. The court heard the matter and reserved judgment on 18.02.2015, pronouncing it on 30.03.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 31, Section 127
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Section 498A Jurisdiction Case — Courts at Wife's Parental Home Have Jurisdiction Even Without Overt Acts of Cruelty There. Continuing Offence and Consequence-Based Jurisdiction Under CrPC Sections 178 and 179 Apply ...