Search Results for "Maharashtra rules"

8889 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8889 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses SEZ Developer's Petition for Octroi Exemption and Refund. State SEZ Policy Exemption Not Enforceable Against Municipal Corporation Without Statutory Amendment.

The petitioner, EON Kharadi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) developer, sought exemption from octroi and refund of octroi paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioners' Writ Petitions for Full Pension Benefits Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service Rules. Pension is a right, not a bounty, and cannot be withheld or reduced arbitrarily; respondents directed to pay full pension with interest.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by retired employees of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, seeking full pension and pensionary benefits...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Bar Council Resolution Prohibiting Full-Time Salaried Law Officers from Practicing as Advocates. The Court Held That the Deletion of Exception Under Rule 49 of the Advocates Act, 1961 Is Valid and Applies to Municipal Law Officers.

The case involves a challenge by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its Principal Law Officer against resolutions of the Bar Council of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Municipal Council Land Allotment. Petitioner Seeks Quashing of Resolutions and Government Approval for Allotment of Land Reserved for Public Purposes Allegedly in Violation of Section 92 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.

The writ petition, originally filed as a Public Interest Litigation, challenged the decisions of Baramati Municipal Council and the State of Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Government Resolution on Teacher Transfers in Maharashtra. Transfer Policy Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, comprising various teachers' unions and individual teachers, filed writ petitions challenging the Government Resolution (GR) dated 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Bar Council Rule Limiting Regular Approval of Law Colleges to Five Years. Rule 2(xxiv) of the Rules of Legal Education 2008 Held Intra Vires the Advocates Act, 1961; Permanent Approval Status Not Recognized Under New Rules.

The petitioners, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar College of Law, challenged the validity of Rule 2(xxiv) ...