Search Results for "Customs and Central Excise Department"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Customs and Central Excise Department"

542 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 542 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Delayed Refund of Special Additional Duty Under Customs Act — Interest Held Payable From Three Months After Initial Refund Application, Not From Subsequent Follow-Up Application

15 Oct 2024

The petitioner, M/s Ajay Industrial Corporation Ltd., filed a refund claim for Special Additional Duty (SAD) of Rs.7,40,458/- on 04 August 2014 under ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Labelling Activity Does Not Amount to Manufacture Under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Additional labelling on already marketable goods without enhancing marketability does not constitute manufacture, and extended period of limitation is applicable due to suppression of facts.

30 Apr 2024

The case involves a batch of civil appeals filed by the revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against an order of CESTAT which allowed the responde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Show-Cause Notice Under Customs Act — No Interference at Pre-Adjudication Stage. Section 28(11) of Customs Act, 1962 Upheld as Valid and Compensatory in Nature.

30 Jan 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Royaloak Furniture India LLP, a furniture importer, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MODVAT Credit Denial Under Rule 57C of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exempted Final Products Not Eligible for Credit.

20 Dec 2016

The petitioners, Atlas Automotive Components Private Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Petitioner Entitled to Concessional Rate for Gold Dore Bars Imported for Refining. Proper Officer's Acceptance of Self-Declaration Precludes Reopening of Assessment Without Fresh Material Under Notification No.12/2012-Customs.

11 Jan 2016

The petitioner, M/s Rajesh Exports Limited, an importer, manufacturer, and exporter of gold jewellery, imported gold dore bars containing impurities f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

30 Jan 2015

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Central Excise Registration Without Notice. Petitioner's Registration Cancelled for Shifting Premises Without Fresh Registration, But Court Held That Natural Justice Requires Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Cancellation.

7 Sep 2011

The petitioner, M/s Borochemie (India) Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in import and sale of goods like Borax Pentahydrate. It obtained Central Excise registra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case. Settlement Commission's order upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962 granting immunity from interest.

13 Oct 2010

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Return of Security Deposit with Interest in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.10 Crores with 18% Interest After CESTAT Set Aside Confiscation Order. The Court held that once proceedings are finalized in favour of the importer, the revenue cannot retain the security deposit and must return it with interest from the date of deposit under the Customs Act, 1962.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, M/s Pride Foramer, a company engaged in offshore oil exploration, imported a rig 'Pride Pensylvania' for a contract with ONGC. On 15 M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Levy of Excise Duty on Fabrication and Construction of Structurals - Activities Do Not Amount to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Fabrication at site results in immovable property, not excisable goods.

29 Apr 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. and Ceat Tyres of India ...

12 13 14 15 16

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)