Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Delayed Refund of Special Additional Duty Under Customs Act — Interest Held Payable From Three Months After Initial Refund Application, Not From Subsequent Follow-Up Application

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 739
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s Ajay Industrial Corporation Ltd., filed a refund claim for Special Additional Duty (SAD) of Rs.7,40,458/- on 04 August 2014 under notification No. 102/2007-Cus. The respondent, Deputy Commissioner of Customs, rejected the claim on 17 February 2017. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the petitioner's appeal and remanded the matter on 30 June 2022. Despite the remand, the respondent delayed disposal, leading the petitioner to file a grievance and eventually a writ petition. On 01 April 2024, the respondent finally allowed the refund but did not award any interest. The petitioner sought interest at 6% per annum under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962, claiming a delay of 09 years and 182 days from the initial application. The respondent argued that interest should run only from 08 November 2022, three months after the petitioner's follow-up letter dated 08 August 2022, relying on the Explanation to Section 27A and the Customs Refund Application (Form) Regulations, 1995. The court rejected this contention, holding that the initial application was complete and never found deficient; the follow-up letter was merely a reminder. The Explanation to Section 27A did not apply because the Commissioner (Appeals) only remanded, not ordered refund. The court directed the respondent to pay interest at 6% per annum from 04 September 2014 (three months after the initial application) until the date of refund, within four weeks, with the amount to be calculated and paid accordingly.

Headnote

A) Customs Law - Interest on Delayed Refund - Section 27A Customs Act, 1962 - Interest runs from three months after initial refund application, not from subsequent follow-up application - Petitioner filed refund claim on 04 August 2014; respondent delayed refund until 01 April 2024 after two remands by Commissioner (Appeals) - Court held that interest under Section 27A is payable from 04 September 2014 (three months after initial application) at 6% per annum, rejecting respondent's argument that interest runs only from 08 November 2022 (three months after follow-up letter) - Held that follow-up letter was merely a reminder and not a fresh refund application (Paras 15-22)

B) Customs Law - Explanation to Section 27A - Not applicable where Commissioner (Appeals) remands matter - Explanation deems appellate order as refund order only where appellate authority itself orders refund; here Commissioner (Appeals) only remanded, and original authority passed refund order - Held that Explanation does not apply to change starting point for interest calculation (Paras 17-18)

C) Customs Law - Customs Refund Application (Form) Regulations, 1995 - Deemed receipt of complete application - Initial application dated 04 August 2014 was never found incomplete or returned; therefore, it is deemed complete and interest runs from three months after that date - Follow-up letter dated 08 August 2022 cannot be treated as a fresh application (Paras 18-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether interest on delayed refund under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 is payable from three months after the initial refund application dated 04 August 2014 or from three months after a subsequent follow-up application dated 08 August 2022

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Respondent directed to pay interest at 6% per annum on the refund amount of Rs.7,40,458/- from 04 September 2014 (three months after initial application) until the date of refund, within four weeks. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Interest on delayed refund under Section 27A Customs Act runs from three months after the date of initial refund application
  • not from date of subsequent follow-up application
  • Explanation to Section 27A does not apply where Commissioner (Appeals) remands matter and original authority passes refund order
  • Customs Refund Application (Form) Regulations
  • 1995 require acknowledgment of completeness for deemed receipt date
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (10) 2522

Writ Petition No. 13314 of 2024

2024-10-15

M.S. Sonak, Jitendra Jain

2024:BHC-AS:40844-DB

Ms Raminder Kaur i/by Mr Sunil for Petitioner; Mr Karan Adik a/w Ms Mamta Omle for Respondent

M/s Ajay Industrial Corporation Ltd.

Deputy Commissioner of Customs, CRC-I, JNCH

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus for payment of interest on delayed refund of Special Additional Duty under the Customs Act, 1962.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondent to pay interest at 6% per annum on delayed refund of SAD under Sections 27 and 27A of the Customs Act.

Filing Reason

Respondent delayed refund of SAD for almost ten years and did not award any interest on the delayed refund despite allowing the refund on 01 April 2024.

Previous Decisions

Refund claim initially rejected on 17 February 2017; Commissioner (Appeals) allowed appeal and remanded on 30 June 2022; respondent again rejected on 16 October 2020; Commissioner (Appeals) again allowed appeal and remanded on 30 June 2022; refund finally allowed on 01 April 2024 without interest.

Issues

Whether interest on delayed refund under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 is payable from three months after the initial refund application dated 04 August 2014 or from three months after a subsequent follow-up application dated 08 August 2022. Whether the Explanation to Section 27A applies to change the starting point for interest calculation when the Commissioner (Appeals) remands the matter.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that interest at 6% per annum is payable from 04 September 2014 (three months after initial application) due to delay of 09 years and 182 days. Respondent argued that interest runs only from 08 November 2022 (three months after follow-up letter dated 08 August 2022) relying on Explanation to Section 27A and Customs Refund Application Regulations, 1995.

Ratio Decidendi

Interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 on delayed refund runs from three months after the date of the initial refund application, not from a subsequent follow-up application, where the initial application was complete and never found deficient. The Explanation to Section 27A does not apply where the Commissioner (Appeals) remands the matter and the original authority passes the refund order.

Judgment Excerpts

The respondent’s contention about the petitioner's case being covered by the explanation to Section 27A is untenable. This is not a case of an order of refund made by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) only remanded the matter to the respondent, who ultimately ordered the refund. There is no allegation about the initial application for refund being incomplete or containing any other deficiencies. Admittedly, no deficiencies were pointed out to the petitioner either within 10 days or even later. The application dated 08 August 2022 only requested the respondent to implement the order dated 30 June 2022 made by the Commissioner (Appeals). This application/letter was mere in the nature of a follow-up letter or reminder.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed refund claim on 04 August 2014; rejected on 17 February 2017; appeal allowed and remanded by Commissioner (Appeals); respondent again rejected on 16 October 2020; appeal again allowed and remanded on 30 June 2022; respondent delayed disposal; petitioner filed grievance on CPGRAMS on 15 September 2023; respondent admitted misplacing files; petitioner filed Writ Petition (C) No. 773 of 2024; court directed decision within four weeks on 19 March 2024; respondent allowed refund on 01 April 2024 without interest; petitioner filed present writ petition on 15 October 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act, 1962: 27, 27A
  • Customs Refund Application (Form) Regulations, 1995:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Dispute over Sale of U.S. Surplus War Materials. Misconstruction of Contract and Error on Face of Award Claims Rejected as Umpire's Findings Bind Parties Absent Incorporation of Documents into Award Under Secti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Eviction Notice Against Residents and Shop Occupants in Municipal Corporation Dispute — Structural Audit Reports Not Considered Before Declaring Building Dangerous. Court holds that Municipal Corporation must consider stru...