Search Results for "Article 110"

2210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Pronounced Order on Writ Petitions Challenging Railway Catering Policy Addendum. Petitioners Contended That Addendum Required Cabinet Approval, While Respondents Defended It as Within Competence and for Hygiene Improvement.

The South Western Railway Catering Contractors Association, a registered body of railway catering contractors, filed two writ petitions under Articles...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Over Compassionate Appointment Interpretation of Regulations and Judicial Precedent. A detailed analysis of a court case involving familial claims for compassionate appointment, government regulations and legal precedents.

A contentious issue of compassionate appointment based on familial lineage, juxtaposed against government regulations and judicial precedents. The pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of IT Rules Amendment on Fake News in Reference Opinion — Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT Rules, 2021 Held Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.

The present proceedings arise from a reference made under Chapter-I Rule 7 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 read with Section 98 of...