Over Compassionate Appointment Interpretation of Regulations and Judicial Precedent. A detailed analysis of a court case involving familial claims for compassionate appointment, government regulations and legal precedents.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 167
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

A contentious issue of compassionate appointment based on familial lineage, juxtaposed against government regulations and judicial precedents. The petitioner, seeking employment on compassionate grounds following the demise of a grandfather who was a government employee, faces opposition citing current employment status and legal interpretations. The court's decision underscores the strict scrutiny of compassionate appointment criteria, emphasizing economic dependence and constitutional principles. The ruling clarifies the boundaries of such appointments amidst evolving legal frameworks, highlighting the delicate balance between familial claims and broader public policy considerations.

Issue of Consideration

Shaikh Karim Shaikh Haroon Versus The State of Maharashtra Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 Lawtext (BOM) (6) 109

WRIT PETITION NO. 5324 OF 2024

2024-06-10

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

Mr. Azizoddin R. Syed, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.B. Girase, GP for the Respondent-State

Shaikh Karim Shaikh Haroon

The State of Maharashtra Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Over Compassionate Appointment Interpretation of Regulations and Judicial Precedent. A detailed analysis of a court case involving familial claims for compassionate appointment, government regulations and legal precedents.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Lack of Motive. Conviction based on tampered dying declaration and insufficient evidence set aside.