Over Compassionate Appointment Interpretation of Regulations and Judicial Precedent. A detailed analysis of a court case involving familial claims for compassionate appointment, government regulations and legal precedents.

Sub Category: Bombay High Court
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

A contentious issue of compassionate appointment based on familial lineage, juxtaposed against government regulations and judicial precedents. The petitioner, seeking employment on compassionate grounds following the demise of a grandfather who was a government employee, faces opposition citing current employment status and legal interpretations. The court's decision underscores the strict scrutiny of compassionate appointment criteria, emphasizing economic dependence and constitutional principles. The ruling clarifies the boundaries of such appointments amidst evolving legal frameworks, highlighting the delicate balance between familial claims and broader public policy considerations.

Issue of Consideration: Shaikh Karim Shaikh Haroon Versus The State of Maharashtra Ors.

2024 Lawtext (BOM) (6) 109

WRIT PETITION NO. 5324 OF 2024

2024-06-10

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

Mr. Azizoddin R. Syed, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.B. Girase, GP for the Respondent-State

Shaikh Karim Shaikh Haroon

The State of Maharashtra Ors.

Related Judgement
High Court Over Compassionate Appointment Interpretation of Regulations and Judicial Preced...
Related Judgement
High Court Application for Pre-Arrest Bail Dismissed in Serious Impersonation and Fraud Cas...