Search Results for "Execution Proceedings"

6592 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6592 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 and 11 Petitions in License Termination Dispute with Airports Authority of India. Disputes Over Termination of License to Occupy Airport Premises Held Arbitrable Despite Public Premises Act.

The Bombay High Court dealt with three connected proceedings: two petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and one app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Specific Performance Suit by Reversing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Agreements and Memoranda of Understanding Interpreted Together as Supplementary, with Appellants Found Ready and Willing to Perform Contract Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from four suits filed by the Appellants for specific performance of agreements of sale dated 20.03.1991 and memoranda of understandi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Temple Trusteeship Dispute — Executing Court Cannot Reopen Final Findings. High Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 115 CPC by Setting Aside Executing Court's Order Dismissing Section 47 Application.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the trusteeship of a temple. The suit temple properties were originally administered by three brothers, Sadhasiva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Contract Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The Appellant, Chitali Bottling Limited, filed a Special Civil Suit No.95 of 2020 before the 19th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, seeking a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...