Search Results for "quashing remand order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "quashing remand order"

630 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 630 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in UAPA Jurisdiction Case — Sessions Court Has Power to Add UAPA Offences When No Special Court Notified by State Government. The Court held that under Section 22(3) of the NIA Act, the Sessions Court is the exclusive trial court for UAPA offences when no Special Court is constituted by the State Government, and the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate retains remand jurisdiction.

1 Jan 2024

The State of West Bengal appealed against the Calcutta High Court's order quashing proceedings under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Orders Declaring Sale Deeds Void Under Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014. Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petition Despite Alternate Remedy Under Section 9, Where Civil Court Had Already Held Transaction Was Sale Not Mortgage by Conditional Sale.

15 Nov 2022

The judgment provided is from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, in Writ Petition No. 6581 of 2022, decided by a single judg...

High Court

High Court Dismisses State's Petition Against SSRD Orders in Land Regularization Case. SSRD's Directions for Regularization Based on Auction Price Upheld as Within Jurisdiction Under Rule 108(6) of Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972.

23 Jan 2026

The dispute originated from the allotment of government land in 1967 to M/s. Nav Bharat Potteries Ltd. for a pottery industry at a concessional rate, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition Against Land Tribunal’s Grant of Occupancy Rights. Dispute Involves Validity of Tenancy Surrender and Continuation of Possession Under Sections 44 and 7 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

10 Sep 2015

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the order of the Land Tribunal, Hirekerur, dated 17.07.2002, whic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.

28 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Remand Order in Partition Suit — Directs Trial Court to Decide Issue No. 3 Afresh Without Adding New Property. The court held that the First Appellate Court exceeded its power under Order XLI Rule 23 CPC by directing inclusion of a property voluntarily relinquished by the plaintiff, and the proper remedy was remand under Order XLI Rule 25 CPC.

24 Oct 2024

The appellant, original defendant No. 2, challenged the judgment and decree dated 12.10.2022 passed by the learned District Judge-4, Jalna (First Appe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Form Demanding Arrears Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Due to Non-Application of Mind by Designated Committee. Petitioner's Declaration Under Dispute Category Wrongly Treated as Arrears Category Without Considering Relevant Material.

2 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Unique Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging form SVLDRS-3 issued under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

11 May 2011

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in FERA Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Opportunity Notice and Violation of Speedy Trial. The Court quashed criminal complaints and summoning orders against Standard Chartered Bank and its officer for offences under FERA, holding that the proviso to Section 61(2) of FERA requires a mandatory opportunity notice before prosecution, and that inordinate delay of over 20 years violated Article 21.

21 Jul 2026

The case involves appeals by Standard Chartered Bank and its officer against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, which declined to quash two crimin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Petitions Challenging the Validity of Police-Initiated Criminal Proceedings under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. Alleged that Police Officers Had No Jurisdiction to Investigate or File Charge-sheet for Offences under the Act, Which Require Complaints by Authorized Officers.

6 Feb 2019

...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)