High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Petitions Challenging the Validity of Police-Initiated Criminal Proceedings under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. Alleged that Police Officers Had No Jurisdiction to Investigate or File Charge-sheet for Offences under the Act, Which Require Complaints by Authorized Officers.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 131
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC020105172018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (02) 45

Criminal Petition No.101274/2018 c/w Criminal Petition Nos.101815/2018, 101986/2018, 102023/2018, 102059/2018, 102060/2018, 102061/2018, 102062/2018, 102107/2018, 102122/2018, 102126/2018 & 102281/2018

2019-02-06

H.P. Sandesh

For Petitioners: Smt. Sumangala A Chakalabbi, Sri. Prashant F Goudar, Sri. Harshawardhan M Patil, Sri. Jagadish Patil; For Respondent: Sri. Praveen K Uppar, HCGP

Ravi @ Ravindra S/o. Subbarao Shetty and others (Multiple Petitioners)

The State of Karnataka and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of criminal proceedings pending before various trial courts for offences under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seek quashing of the entire proceedings in the respective cases, including the orders taking cognizance and issuing process.

Previous Decisions

Trial courts had taken cognizance and issued process in some cases; orders challenged in these petitions.

Procedural History

Multiple criminal petitions were filed before the High Court under Section 482 CrPC challenging the proceedings pending before various trial courts. The petitions pertain to different FIRs and private complaints. In some cases, the trial court had taken cognizance and issued process against the petitioners for offences under IPC and MMDR Act and KMMC Rules. The High Court heard all petitions together.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 379, 511
  • Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957: 4(1), 4(1A), 21, 22
  • Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994: 3, 32, 42, 44(1), 44(2)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Invalidates Appointment of General Manager as Police Officer under Motor Vehicles Act Due to Conflict of Interest. Appointment of General Manager as an officer with police powers violates Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, creating a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations — Vicarious Liability Not Attracted Without Clear Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. The court held that under Section 138 of the Negotiable In...