Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Petitions Challenging the Validity of Police-Initiated Criminal Proceedings under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. Alleged that Police Officers Had No Jurisdiction to Investigate or File Charge-sheet for Offences under the Act, Which Require Complaints by Authorized Officers.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-18 09:58:00
  • 107
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC020105172018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (02) 45

Criminal Petition No.101274/2018 c/w Criminal Petition Nos.101815/2018, 101986/2018, 102023/2018, 102059/2018, 102060/2018, 102061/2018, 102062/2018, 102107/2018, 102122/2018, 102126/2018 & 102281/2018

2019-02-06

H.P. Sandesh

For Petitioners: Smt. Sumangala A Chakalabbi, Sri. Prashant F Goudar, Sri. Harshawardhan M Patil, Sri. Jagadish Patil; For Respondent: Sri. Praveen K Uppar, HCGP

Ravi @ Ravindra S/o. Subbarao Shetty and others (Multiple Petitioners)

The State of Karnataka and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of criminal proceedings pending before various trial courts for offences under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seek quashing of the entire proceedings in the respective cases, including the orders taking cognizance and issuing process.

Previous Decisions

Trial courts had taken cognizance and issued process in some cases; orders challenged in these petitions.

Procedural History

Multiple criminal petitions were filed before the High Court under Section 482 CrPC challenging the proceedings pending before various trial courts. The petitions pertain to different FIRs and private complaints. In some cases, the trial court had taken cognizance and issued process against the petitioners for offences under IPC and MMDR Act and KMMC Rules. The High Court heard all petitions together.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 379, 511
  • Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957: 4(1), 4(1A), 21, 22
  • Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994: 3, 32, 42, 44(1), 44(2)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
quashing of proceedings Section 482 CrPC Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 illegal mining jurisdiction of police authorized officer complaint Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses LPA Against Single Judge's Order Setting Aside Administrative Tribunal's Rejection of Section 8A Application Under Goa Mundkars Act. Finding that Prior Summary Inquiry Under Section 29 Does Not Bar a Fresh Declaration Unde... 2026-09-19 08:45:14
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Writ Petition Against Obstruction by Third Party in Execution Proceedings — Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Objection by brother of judgment-debtor claiming independent possession held to be abuse of process where dec... 2026-09-19 08:45:14
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land Acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 11 Arbitration Application for Appointment of Arbitrato...

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Central Excise Refund Interest Dispute Under Section ...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders Allowing Writ Petitions by Lessees in Land Encr...

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Supervisor Appointment for ...

Supreme Court Upholds Plaintiff in Specific Performance Suit Under Specific Relief Act, 19...

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Appeal — Sets Aside NCL...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Lost Your Password?