Search Results for "foreign entity"

311 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 311 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Compliance with BIFR Rehabilitation Scheme and Quashes Pre-deposit Order in Customs Dispute. Merger of Sick Company with Petitioner Under SICA Extinguishes Pre-deposit Liability, and Revenue Authorities Are Bound by the BIFR Scheme.

The petitioner, SMS Lifesciences India Limited, filed two writ petitions. The first sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 (Director G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Compliance with BIFR Rehabilitation Scheme and Waiver of Pre-Deposit in Customs Dispute. BIFR Scheme Binding on Government Departments; Pre-Deposit Condition Quashed for Sick Industrial Company Under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The petitioner, SMS Lifesciences India Limited, filed two writ petitions. The first sought a mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 (Director General o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MSEDCL Tender Process for Composite Power Procurement. Court holds that tender conditions requiring composite bids for thermal and solar power are valid and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Rajesh Sharma, the General Secretary of the Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 9 Petition for Interim Measures in Commercial Matter. Arbitration Act, 1996 invoked for pre-arbitral relief in a contractual dispute.

This petition, filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, sought interim measures from the Bombay High Court. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Pharmaceutical Distributor for Violation of Natural Justice. Blacklisting Without Show Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. Sujal Pharma, a proprietorship firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged a blacklisting order dated 29.10.2021 issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Immediate Refund of Undisputed Income Tax Refund Under Section 168(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Failure to Release Admitted Refund Despite Reminders Constitutes Arbitrary Action

The petitioner, Group M Media India Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court alleging failure by the respondents (income ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...