High Court of Bombay Hears Section 9 Petition for Interim Measures in Commercial Matter. Arbitration Act, 1996 invoked for pre-arbitral relief in a contractual dispute.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This petition, filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, sought interim measures from the Bombay High Court. The petitioner, Gute Reise India Pvt. Ltd., instituted the proceeding against Victorinox India Private Limited and others. The matter was reserved for judgment on 15 April 2025 and pronounced on 6 May 2025. The specific relief sought and the court's decision are not detailed in the available text.

Issue of Consideration

COMM. ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 7296 OF 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (05) 31

CARBPL.7296.2025

2025-05-06

Somashekhar Sundaresan, J.

Mr. Venkatesh Dhond, Mr. Samarth Jaidev, Ms. Kavisha Shah, Ms. Shweta More (for Petitioner); Mr. Samudra Sarangi, Mr. Joran Diwan, Ms. Riya Kalra, Ms. Panya Gupta (for Respondent No.1); Mr. Muthahar Khan (for Respondent No.5)

Gute Reise India Pvt. Ltd.

Victorinox India Private Limited and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for interim measures before commencement of arbitral proceedings under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Remedy Sought

Direction for interim relief (specifics not mentioned).

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Assessment Reopened Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts Held Invalid.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Recovery Claim for Wages During Non-Working Period Despite Permanency Grant. Held that permanency with arrears does not include wages for periods when employees did not actually work, affirming 'no work no pay' ...