High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Pharmaceutical Distributor for Violation of Natural Justice. Blacklisting Without Show Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Sujal Pharma, a proprietorship firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged a blacklisting order dated 29.10.2021 issued by the respondent, Karnataka State Medical Supplies Corporation Limited. The petitioner had submitted a quotation on 25.03.2020 for supply of 2000 units of hand sanitizers at Rs.2500 per unit inclusive of GST during the COVID-19 pandemic. The respondent blacklisted the petitioner without issuing any show cause notice or affording an opportunity of hearing. The petitioner contended that the blacklisting order was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The respondent argued that the blacklisting was justified due to alleged deficiencies in supply. The Court held that blacklisting has serious civil consequences and cannot be imposed without following the principles of natural justice, including issuance of a show cause notice and providing an opportunity of hearing. The Court quashed the blacklisting order insofar as it pertains to the petitioner, but granted liberty to the respondent to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law after issuing a show cause notice and affording an opportunity of hearing.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Blacklisting - Natural Justice - Show Cause Notice - The respondent blacklisted the petitioner firm without issuing any show cause notice or affording an opportunity of hearing, which is violative of principles of natural justice. The Court held that blacklisting has serious civil consequences and cannot be done without following the principles of natural justice. (Paras 4-6)

B) Constitutional Law - Article 226 - Judicial Review - Quashing of Blacklisting Order - The Court, exercising its writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, quashed the blacklisting order dated 29.10.2021 insofar as it pertains to the petitioner, as the order was passed in violation of natural justice. (Paras 6-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of blacklisting passed by the respondent without issuing a show cause notice and without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 29.10.2021 blacklisting the petitioner is quashed insofar as it pertains to the petitioner. Liberty is reserved to the respondent to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law after issuing a show cause notice and affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Blacklisting
  • Show cause notice
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Proportionality
  • Legitimate expectation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (KAR) (04) 25

WP No. 20520 of 2021 (GM-RES)

2024-04-18

M. Nagaprasanna

Sri Prithveesh M.K. for petitioner, Smt. Sumana Baliga M. for respondent

M/s. Sujal Pharma

Karnataka State Medical Supplies Corporation Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a blacklisting order.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the blacklisting order dated 29.10.2021 issued by the respondent insofar as it pertains to the petitioner.

Filing Reason

The petitioner was blacklisted without being issued a show cause notice or afforded an opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the blacklisting order passed without show cause notice and opportunity of hearing is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the blacklisting order was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice as no show cause notice was issued. Respondent argued that the blacklisting was justified due to alleged deficiencies in supply.

Ratio Decidendi

Blacklisting has serious civil consequences and cannot be imposed without following the principles of natural justice, including issuance of a show cause notice and providing an opportunity of hearing. An order passed in violation of natural justice is unsustainable in law.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order dated 29-10-2021 issued by the respondent blacklisting the firm of the petitioner. The impugned order of blacklisting is quashed insofar as it pertains to the petitioner.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging the blacklisting order dated 29.10.2021. The petition was heard on 18.04.2024 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Pharmaceutical Distributor for Violation of Natural Justice. Blacklisting Without Show Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
Related Judgement
High Court Trustees’ Authority in Managing Encroached Land for Slum Rehabilitation: Bombay High Court Clarifies. Bombay High Court allows PLAINTIFFS to collaborate with developers to undertake slum rehabilitation on its encroached lands, empowering trustees...