Search Results for "fee default"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "fee default"

374 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 374 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Commercial Suit and Interim Application in Asset Reconstruction Dispute — Upholds Validity of Assignment of Debt and Security Interest. Court holds that an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) is entitled to enforce security interest under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) after valid assignment of debt.

15 Apr 2026

The Applicant, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, an Asset Reconstruction Company registered with the RBI, filed a Commercial Suit (COMSS No. 124 of 2025) a...

High Court

Madras High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Financial Dispute Over Hypothecated Assets. Court allows appointment of Receiver under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to preserve assets pending arbitration.

9 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Vivriti Capital Limited, filed Arb.O.P.No.720 of 2025 under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.

18 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

10 Jul 2024

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — One Time Settlement Not Binding as Bank Did Not Accept Offer. Court Held That Mere Submission of OTS Proposal Does Not Create Binding Contract; Bank's Rejection Valid.

8 Jul 2024

The petitioners, borrowers of the respondent bank, challenged the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Bangalore in Diary No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court's Decision in Property Sale Dispute, Reversing High Court's Second Appeal - Validates Sale Deed Executed Under Power of Attorney and Awards Rendition of Accounts Against Agent. Registered Power of Attorney Cannot Be Cancelled Orally Under Registration Act, 1908, and Bona Fide Purchaser Protected Despite Agent's Breach of Internal Agreement.

28 Jan 2022

The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff, a junior engineer, regarding property he owned. He entered into an oral agreement to sell t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Civil Procedure Case Upholding Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The Court Held That Res Judicata Cannot Be Determined in an Order 7 Rule 11 Application as It Requires Examination of Previous Suit Records Beyond Plaint Averments Under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

9 Aug 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing a revision petition against an order of the Trial Court that rejected an ap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Plaint in Civil Suit Due to Failure to Seek Necessary Declarations Under Specific Relief Act. The suit was barred under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, as the plaintiff admitted executing sale deeds as security but did not seek declarations regarding their validity, leading to rejection under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with no amendment permitted after rejection.

20 Jul 2021

The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff (appellant) against multiple defendants (respondents) concerning property transactions and a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining BCCI from Terminating IPL Franchise Agreement with Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited. Court Holds Termination Notice Invalid for Not Providing 30-Day Cure Period Under Clause 11.1 of Franchise Agreement.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (DCHL), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to r...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)