Search Results for "excavation material"

147 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 147 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Demolition Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' structure demolished without notice under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and court orders restoration.

The petitioners, occupiers of a plot of land in Jogeshwari, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 15 June 2023 passed by the Executive Engineer of the Bri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Waste Management Contract Dispute — Petitioner Granted Protection Against Termination and Bank Guarantee Invocation Pending Arbitration.

The petitioner, PMP Infratech Pvt Ltd, an AA Class Government Registered Civil Contractor, was engaged by the respondent, Bharat Petro Resources Ltd (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.

The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award, Reduces Future Interest from 18% to 9%. Court upheld the arbitrator's findings on quantum but modified the future interest rate as excessive under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), a Central Government Corporation, challenged an arbitral award dated 3 July 2006 passed by a so...