Search Results for "arbitrary exclusion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "arbitrary exclusion"

781 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 781 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declines to Interfere in Tender Award for Ash Handling Plant; Holds Scope of Judicial Review Limited and Finds No Arbitrariness in Awarding Contract to Lowest Bidder Consortium Despite Office Memorandum Barring Chinese Companies.

2 Nov 2022

The writ petition was filed by Macawber Beekay Pvt. Ltd. challenging the notice inviting tender dated 24.06.2022 and the consequent letter of intent i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Guidelines on Arrest and Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act. Directions Requiring Preliminary Enquiry and Approval for Arrest Quashed as Legislative Overreach, but Anticipatory Bail Direction Upheld.

1 Oct 2019

The Union of India filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgment dated 20.3.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.416 of 2018, which had issued gu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears State of Maharashtra's Appeals Against High Court's Decision Striking Down Section 33A of Bombay Police Act, 1951 as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The core issue is whether the prohibition of dance performances in eating houses, permit rooms, or beer bars is a reasonable restriction on trade and is within the State's legislative competence.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and others assailing the judgment and order dated 12th April 2006 o...

High Court

KAHC010480352008_1

10 Aug 2018

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, Holding Procedure Not Discriminatory or Arbitrary. Provisions for Correction of Revenue Records and Consolidation Powers Not Violative of Articles 14 and 31(2) of the Constitution.

17 Dec 1958

The proceedings concerned a challenge to the constitutional validity of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (U.P. V of 1954) as amended by Act No. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. The petitions sought quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 under the Karnataka BDA Act, 1976 regarding Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners Against Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. Notifications Issued Under Sections 17 and 19 of BDA Act Challenged.

11 Jul 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

1 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Appellants' challenge to 1965 acquisition notification filed in 1992 held time-barred under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 and earlier writ petition dismissal operates as res judicata.

29 Nov 2016

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in 1992 seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of two suit properties bear...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Health Insurance Renewal Petitions Against United India Insurance Company — Insurer Cannot Refuse Renewal Based on Pre-existing Disease Exclusion After Continuous Coverage Under Group Policy. The court held that the exclusion clause for pre-existing diseases applies only at the inception of the first policy and not at renewal, and that refusal to renew was arbitrary.

19 Aug 2013

The petitioners, account holders of Bank of Maharashtra, were covered under a group health insurance scheme called 'Mahabank Swasthya Yojna' provided ...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)