Search Results for "Patent Illegality"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Patent Illegality"

757 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 757 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award of damages for short supply of coal, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

25 Jun 2026

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Mahaguj Collieries Ltd. (original respondent) challenging an ...

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Port Contract Dispute — Liquidated Damages Recovery Upheld for 768-Day Delay. The court held that extension of time does not bar recovery of liquidated damages under Section 55 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the contractor must prove no loss was caused.

9 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Chennai Port Trust, issued a tender for restoration of a damaged revetment structure after cyclones. The respondent, a contractor, was...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Clause Validity Dispute Under Lease Agreement. The arbitration clause designating the lessee's Managing Director as sole arbitrator is upheld as valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, absent contravention of public policy.

1 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court heard appeals by Indian Oil Corporation Limited against a judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute arose from a lease agreemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Writ Petition Maintainable Against Sessions Judge's Order Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 Despite Finality Clause. Finality Clause Under Section 61G Does Not Bar Constitutional Remedy Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

9 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM), filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 01/08/2017 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Award Under Section 50(1)(b) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Not Binding on Non-Signatory Respondents as They Were Not Parties to Arbitration Agreement.

4 Jan 2017

The appellant, Integrated Sales Services Limited (ISSL), a Hong Kong company, entered into a Representation Agreement on 18th September 2000 with DMC ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Claim for Refund of Membership Fees Dismissed as Barred by Limitation and Not Arbitrable. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Are Not Patently Illegal or in Conflict with Public Policy.

27 Oct 2015

The petitioners, Jain Social Group, Nashik (an association of Jain individuals) and its member Mohan K. Bagmar, filed an arbitration petition under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Award of Interest on Interest and Pendente Lite Interest on Mobilisation Advance Held Contrary to Contract. The court found patent illegality in the award of compound interest and interest on mobilisation advance beyond contractual terms, and remitted counter claims for fresh consideration.

13 Aug 2015

The petitioner, M/s P.N. Writer & Co. Pvt. Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 13 February 2012 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Conviction Under Section 48 of MRTU & PULP Act for Unfair Labour Practice. Concurrent findings of fact by Labour Court and Industrial Court upheld as no perversity or illegality shown.

30 Aug 2013

The petitioner, Pandurang Keshav Waghchaure, was prosecuted along with another accused for an offence punishable under Section 48 of the Maharashtra R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

10 Jun 2013

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)