WRIT PETITION NO. 430 OF 2025
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "Highway Administration"
150 result(s) found
Found 150 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Tender Conditions as Misconceived. Tender conditions requiring prior experience and financial capacity are valid and not arbitrary.
30 Apr 2024The petitioners, four private limited companies engaged in infrastructure development, filed a writ petition challenging the terms of a tender floated...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Level Crossing Accident Case — Joint Liability Upheld for Negligence of Railway Staff. Court affirms that keeping level crossing gate open for road traffic without warning constitutes negligence, making Railways jointly and severally liable with truck owner and insurer under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855.
10 Aug 2023The case arises from a fatal accident on 24th January 1979, when a truck (Registration No. MHS 7493) carrying sugarcane and driven by Mohamed Amanjibh...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Coal Mine Development and Production Agreement for Non-Submission of Bank Guarantee Extension. Termination Without Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Held Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice Under Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015.
10 Feb 2023The petitioner, B. S. Ispat Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, emerged as the successful bidder in a tender...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — No Evidence of Demand for Dowry or Cruelty Soon Before Death. Acquittal of husband and in-laws for offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 306 IPC upheld as prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients beyond reasonable doubt.
11 Mar 2021The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 26-12-2002 passed by the learned II Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednaga...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
13 Feb 2020The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Hostile Complainant and Lack of Evidence. State fails to prove charges under Sections 364-A, 386, 387 IPC as prosecution witnesses turned hostile and identification of accused was doubtful.
15 Jan 2020The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 16/12/1999 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 1...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Extortion Allegations Against Police — No Grounds Made Out for CBI/CID Probe or Departmental Enquiry. The Court held that the petitioner failed to substantiate allegations of illegal arrest and extortion by police officers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
31 Oct 2012The petitioner, Sanjeev Bishnudev Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction for transfer of inv...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
14 Jun 2011The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction and life imprisonment of the appellants under Sections 302 and 323 read with Section 34 of the I...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Contract for Manufacture of Pharmaceutical Products Held to be Sale, Not Works Contract Under Section 194C of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the ITAT's decision that the agreement between the assessee and the manufacturer was a contract for sale of goods, as property passed only on delivery and the agreement was on a principal-to-principal basis.
12 Mar 2010The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held t...
- 63
