Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Coal Mine Development and Production Agreement for Non-Submission of Bank Guarantee Extension. Termination Without Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Held Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice Under Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, B. S. Ispat Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, emerged as the successful bidder in a tender process under the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 and the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Rules, 2014. A Coal Mine Development and Production Agreement (CMDPA) dated 17.08.2022 was executed between the petitioner and respondent 2, the Nominated Authority. The petitioner challenged the termination of the CMDPA vide letter dated 02.11.2022 issued by respondent 2. The facts were largely undisputed. In accordance with the CMDPA, the petitioner furnished a bank guarantee (BG) dated 13.12.2021 issued by Axis Bank Ltd., Nagpur for Rs.4,32,48,666.00, valid from 13.12.2021 to 14.07.2022. The BG was subsequently amended on 14.06.2022 and 07.09.2022 to extend validity from 14.07.2022 to 14.09.2022 and from 14.09.2022 to 14.12.2022 respectively. The petitioner also paid amounts of Rs.5,41,93,508.56 on 21.09.2022 and Rs.5,40,60,832.50 on 23.09.2022 into the designated bank account. The respondent terminated the CMDPA on the ground that the petitioner failed to submit an extended bank guarantee. The court noted that the petitioner had submitted the extended BG and the termination was without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing. The court held that the termination was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The impugned termination letter dated 02.11.2022 was quashed and set aside. The respondents were directed to restore the CMDPA and all rights and obligations thereunder. The petition was allowed in the above terms.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Right to be Heard - Termination of Contract - The petitioner challenged the termination of CMDPA for alleged failure to submit extended bank guarantee. The court held that the termination without prior notice or opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The impugned termination letter was quashed and set aside. (Paras 6-8)

B) Coal Mines - Contractual Obligations - Bank Guarantee - Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 - The petitioner furnished bank guarantee which was extended twice. The respondent terminated the agreement alleging non-submission of extended BG. The court found that the petitioner had submitted the extended BG and the termination was unjustified. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of the Coal Mine Development and Production Agreement (CMDPA) by the Nominated Authority without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned termination letter dated 02.11.2022 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to restore the CMDPA and all rights and obligations thereunder. The petition is allowed in the above terms.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Termination of contract without notice
  • Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act 2015
  • Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Rules 2014
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (01) 295

WRIT PETITION NO.7060 OF 2022

2023-02-10

Rohit B. Deo, Y. G. Khobragade

Mr. M. G. Bhangde, Senior Counsel with Mr. R. M. Bhangde for Petitioner; Mr. Nandesh Deshpande, Deputy Solicitor General of India for Respondents 1 & 2

B. S. Ispat Limited

Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Coal; Nominated Authority, Ministry of Coal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging termination of Coal Mine Development and Production Agreement

Remedy Sought

Quashing of termination letter dated 02.11.2022 and restoration of CMDPA

Filing Reason

Termination of CMDPA by respondent 2 without prior notice or opportunity of hearing

Issues

Whether the termination of CMDPA without affording an opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the termination was without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing and that the bank guarantee had been extended. Respondents argued that the petitioner failed to submit an extended bank guarantee.

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of a contract without affording an opportunity of hearing to the affected party is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The petitioner had submitted the extended bank guarantee and the termination was unjustified.

Judgment Excerpts

The termination of the CMDPA is without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The impugned termination letter dated 02.11.2022 is quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the termination of the CMDPA by the Nominated Authority. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 10.02.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015:
  • Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Rules, 2014:
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Coal Mine Development and Production Agreement for Non-Submission of Bank Guarantee Extension. Termination Without Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Held Arbitrary and Violative o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Violation of Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Motion Held Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure