Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1599 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1599 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Failure to Consider Evidence. The court held that the arbitrator's failure to consider the contractor's evidence and counter-claim, and the award being unreasoned, rendered the award patently illegal and in conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Pancham International, a contractor, was appointed by the Union of India (Respondent No.1) for supply of bush shirts, pants, and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Land Licence Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination. The court held that the arbitration clause is independent and not extinguished by termination of the agreement, and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Dec 2013

The applicant, M/s Navkar Corporation Limited, entered into a land licence agreement with the respondent, Divisional Railway Manager, Central Railway,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Union of India Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of 'Fall Clause' in Repeat Order for Supply of PSC Sleepers Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

26 Jun 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (Central Railway) against an order of a learned Single Judge dismissing its challenge under Section ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bidder Qualification in Tender Process — Debarment by One State Does Not Automatically Disqualify in Another State's Tender Without Specific Clause in Tender Document.

27 Jun 2016

The Petitioner, Smart Chip Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision of Respondent Nos....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Distinction Between Section 34 of 1940 Act and Section 8 of 1996 Act Clarified. Order Referring Parties to Arbitration Set Aside as Trial Court Failed to Consider Whether Dispute is Arbitrable and Whether Application Under Section 8 Was Maintainable After Filing Written Statement.

9 Oct 2015

The appellant, Sri G.R. Amarnath, filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the judgment and order dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Filed by Developer and Flat Purchasers Seeking Quashing of Stop Work Notice and Grant of Occupation Certificate. Dispute Between Developer and Landowner Leads to Stalling of Occupation Certificate for Completed Wing D.

21 Nov 2025

The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The first petition, Writ P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy. The court upheld the award based on evidence and contractual terms, rejecting the borrower's contention that the loan was already recovered through sale of repossessed vehicles.

27 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Eagle Travel Agency, a sole proprietorship through its proprietor Hardik Kotak, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 34 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Due to Arbitrator Disqualification in Multi-State Cooperative Dispute. Failure to Disclose Bias and Withdrawal from Similar Matters Constitutes Grounds for Setting Aside Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Jun 2012

The petitioner, The Saraswat Cooperative Bank Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Dispute Despite Insurer's Denial of Liability. Arbitration Clause in Comprehensive Mega Risks Insurance Policy Held to Survive Repudiation of Claim.

21 Oct 2016

The applicant, Essar Steel India Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an ...

High Court

Division Bench of Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Octroi Collection Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's Award of Rs.11.55 Crores with Interest and Costs Was Set Aside Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on Allegations of Manipulated Survey and Patent Illegality.

11 Aug 2011

The dispute arose from a contract dated 21.03.2003 between M/s. Monarch Erectors Pvt. Ltd. (the agent) and Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporatio...

126 127 128 129 130

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)