Search Results for "compensation under 2013 Act"

3868 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3868 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 20,000 per Hectare. Market Value Determined by Comparable Sale Method with 20% Deduction for Development Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Harish Ratanlal Bhansali, was the owner of agricultural land Survey No. 312/B measuring 4 Hectare 90 R situated at village Goregaon, Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Arbitrator's Order Rejecting Interim Relief — Holds That Arbitrator Must Consider Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Before Refusing Interim Injunction.

The appellant, Spice Digital Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 16...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Acquisition Case — Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 as Award Passed After Five Years from Section 4 Notification Under Old Act.

The petitioner, Sheetalkumar Sadashiv Zambare, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for his lands in Kolh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Overruling of Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs State to Complete Land Acquisition and Pay Compensation After 30-Year Delay -- Systemic Negligence in Land Acquisition Process Addressed in Writ Petition

The petitioners, landowners from Beed district, filed a writ petition after their lands were taken into possession in 1996 for a village tank project,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Alternative Remedy Under Section 351 Available.

The petitioner, Abdul Karim Ahmed Mansoori, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 1st August...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates on Validity of HPCL Notifications Discontinuing and Revising Pension Benefits. The Court Examines Whether Employees Recruited Post-Acquisition and Retired Under ESSO/LIL Plans Are Entitled to Pension Protections Under ESSO Act, 1974 and Amalgamation Order.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Pensioners Social & Welfare Association, a registered so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal and Allows Cross-Objection in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land.

The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnataka for a highway improvement project. The land belonging to Smt. Ka...