Search Results for "Void Order"

5347 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5347 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Assistant Teachers in School Termination Dispute — Appointment Not Void Ab Initio Despite Non-Compliance with M.E.P.S. Act, 1977. School Tribunal's Order of Reinstatement Upheld as Management Failed to Follow Proper Termination Procedure Under Section 5 of the Act.

The case involves three Letters Patent Appeals filed by Assistant Teachers (Smt. Shobha Karve, Smt. Sharada Sureshrao Deshmukh, and Smt. Asha A. Gavka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Trust Dispute for Non-Compliance with Section 50 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. Suit by devotees challenging removal of deity held barred without Charity Commissioner's consent.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by defendant trustees (defendant Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5) in a suit seeking rejection of the plaint under Order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Section 14 Order and Auction Under SARFAESI Act, 2002; Petitioner Alleges Violation of Natural Justice. The Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Given Available Alternate Remedy Under Section 17.

The petitioner, a sole proprietor of a knitwear unit, had availed term loan and cash credit facilities aggregating Rs. 4.55 crores from respondent no....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Delay Condonation Application in Specific Performance Suit — Unexplained Delay of Over 8 Years Not Condonable. Cross-Objection Filed After 3015 Days Without Sufficient Cause Rejected Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The judgment pertains to an application for condonation of delay of 3015 and 3166 days in filing cross-objection in Second Appeals No. 658/2007 and 70...