Search Results for "Explanation sale"

3210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Revenue's Appeal on Disallowance of Legal and Professional Charges in Income Tax Case. Tribunal's Order Set Aside Regarding Legal Expenses but Upheld on Depreciation and Section 54EC Deduction.

The appeal by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 19/1/2010 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assignee of Debt to Proceed Under SARFAESI Act Despite Company Being Under Liquidation. Assignee Steps into Shoes of Original Lender and Can Enforce Security Interest Under Section 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Limited, is a company registered as a Reconstruction Company and Securitisation Company with the Reserve Bank of India u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Shop Due to Failure to Prove Valid and Concluded Contract. Plaintiff failed to establish that the agreement was final and binding, and the suit was barred by limitation.

The plaintiff, Shriram Gangaram Gupta, filed a suit in 1980 seeking a declaration that there was a valid and concluded agreement with Defendants Nos. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Metro Centre Project. Claimant's Appeal Partly Allowed; State's Appeal Dismissed.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition reference. The claimant, Arvind Bhaskar Limaye, owned land in Survey No.48/B admea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...