Search Results for "Objects Clause"

2214 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2214 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Order on Writ Petition Challenging Compromise Decree and Execution Proceedings — Fraud and Non-Alienation Clause Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 Considered

The petitioners, judgment debtors in a compromise decree, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxability of Interest Received on Enhanced Motor Accident Compensation. Petitioner Claims Interest is Capital Receipt and Not Taxable; Revenue Relies on Sections 56(2)(viii) and 145A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, a 48-year-old man rendered paraplegic and bedridden since a road accident at age 8, filed a writ petition challenging the taxability o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates on Validity of HPCL Notifications Discontinuing and Revising Pension Benefits. The Court Examines Whether Employees Recruited Post-Acquisition and Retired Under ESSO/LIL Plans Are Entitled to Pension Protections Under ESSO Act, 1974 and Amalgamation Order.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Pensioners Social & Welfare Association, a registered so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Heard Multiple Commercial Appeals Involving Interim Applications in Arbitration Petitions. Appellants Challenged Orders in Commercial Arbitration Petitions Against a Partnership Firm and Its Partners.

These matters are commercial appeals filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction. The appeals arise out ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dissents That Designated Court Under MCOC Act Cannot Order Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Without Prior Sanction. Special Court Not a Magistrate and Section 23(1) Bar Overrides Private Complaint Procedure.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions involving a common legal question: whether a designated court under the Maharashtra Control of O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds MEP Notification for Iron Ore and Steel Products as Valid Exercise of Power Under Foreign Trade Act. Court holds that Minimum Export Price is a reasonable condition for export licensing and does not violate fundamental rights.

The petitioners, JSW Steel Limited and Welspun Tradings Limited, along with their officers, challenged the constitutional validity of the Minimum Expo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in a Commercial Contract Dispute. Appointment Made after Respondent Failed to Prove Valid Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Forfeiture of Right.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 8 January 2003 between Voltas Limited (applicant) and Rolta India Limited (respondent) for the supply, erect...