Bombay High Court Allows Doctors' Petition to Quash PCPNDT Act Notification for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to issue show cause notice and provide hearing before suspending registration under Section 17(2)(3) of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994 renders the notification illegal and unsustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Dr. Niraj Kadam and Dr. Rekha Kadam, are doctors running a hospital in Wardha, Maharashtra. They challenged a notification dated 16.3.2016 issued by the State of Maharashtra under Section 17(2)(3) of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994 (PCPNDT Act). The notification allegedly suspended or cancelled their registration under the Act. The petitioners contended that the notification was issued without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The State, represented by the Public Prosecutor, argued that the notification was valid. The court heard both sides and found that the notification was issued without complying with the mandatory requirement of giving a show cause notice and hearing. The court held that the principles of natural justice are fundamental and must be adhered to before any adverse administrative action. Consequently, the court quashed the notification and allowed the petitions. The court also directed that rule be made absolute.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Show Cause Notice - Section 17(2)(3) of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994 - The court considered whether a notification suspending registration under the PCPNDT Act could be issued without prior show cause notice and hearing. Held that the principles of natural justice require that before any adverse order is passed, the affected party must be given an opportunity of hearing. The notification was quashed as it was issued in violation of natural justice. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notification dated 16.3.2016 issued under Section 17(2)(3) of the PCPNDT Act, 1994, without issuing a show cause notice and affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petitions and quashed the notification dated 16.3.2016. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Show cause notice
  • Hearing
  • Section 17(2)(3) PCPNDT Act
  • Quashing of notification
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 172

Criminal Writ Petition No.391 of 2023 and Civil Writ Petition No.3918 of 2023

2026-07-17

Urmila Joshi-Phalke, Nivedita P. Mehta

Shri S. Zia Quazi for Petitioners, Shri D.V. Chauhan (Senior Counsel) assisted by Shri S.S. Hulke, APP for Respondent No.1/State

Dr. Niraj s/o Kumarsinh Kadam and Dr. Rekha wife of Niraj Kadam

State of Maharashtra, Public Health Department and Dr. Mohan s/o Bhanudas Sute

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal and Civil Writ Petitions challenging a notification under the PCPNDT Act.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Notification dated 16.3.2016 issued under Section 17(2)(3) of the PCPNDT Act.

Filing Reason

The notification was issued without show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the notification dated 16.3.2016 under Section 17(2)(3) of the PCPNDT Act is valid when issued without show cause notice and hearing.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the notification was issued without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice. Respondent/State argued that the notification was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

Before any adverse order is passed under Section 17(2)(3) of the PCPNDT Act, the affected party must be given a show cause notice and an opportunity of hearing, as per principles of natural justice. Failure to do so renders the order illegal and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

By these petitions, petitioners have challenged Notification dated 16.3.2016 issued by respondent No.1 under provisions of Section 17(2)(3) of The Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No.391/2023 and Civil Writ Petition No.3918/2023 challenging the notification dated 16.3.2016. The court heard both sides and delivered judgment on 17.7.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994: Section 17(2)(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Doctors' Petition to Quash PCPNDT Act Notification for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to issue show cause notice and provide hearing before suspending registration under Section 17(2)(3) of the Pre-Conception and Pre-N...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Provisional Employee Seeking Regularization - Provisional Appointment Does Not Confer Right to Regularization Despite Long Service