Search Results for "substantially same issues"

1799 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1799 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examined Challenge by Petitioner Co-operative Bank to Registrar's Orders Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petition questioned whether inquiry under Section 83 could proceed before the three-month rectification period under Section 82 had lapsed.

The writ petition arose from a challenge by a co-operative bank, Mumbai District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd., against two orders passed by the Divisional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Award of Container Terminal Contract to PSA International. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any public interest or mala fides in the tender process for the 4th Container Terminal at JNPT.

The petitioner, Mandar Narhari Parab, claiming to be a journalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Admitted a Batch of Appeals from Orders in Property-Related Disputes. The Specific Nature of the Dispute and the Court’s Directions Remain Unclear as the Judgment Text Was Truncated.

The judgment dated 12 December 2011 was delivered by Justice R.M. Borde of the High Court of Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction). The matter involve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal in Industrial Dispute — Scope of Enquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Clarified. Labour Court's Order Rejecting Approval for Dismissal Restored as It Did Not Exceed Its Limited Jurisdiction.

The appeal arose from a dispute between John D'Souza, a workman, and the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). The workman joined as a b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Appellate Court's Dismissal of Suit. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove agreement and readiness and willingness, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable property. The plaintiff, Manoj Manilal Gala (appellant), ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for FEMA Violations in Bogus Export Case — Appellant Director Held Liable for Receiving Remittances Without Actual Exports Under Sections 3(b) and 3(d) of FEMA.

The case involves an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreig...