Search Results for "interim order modification"

1265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Appointments to Non-Statutory Commission. Appointees Held to Serve at Pleasure; No Right to Tenure or Hearing; Change in Policy by New Government Not Arbitrary.

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by three former Chairman/Members of the Maharashtra State Commission for S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Possession Based on Prior Possession. The court held that the appellant had established prior possession and dispossession without consent, entitling her to a decree for possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Cian De Souza, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking vacation and peaceful possession of Flat No.4, Ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Invocation of Performance Guarantee in Arbitration Dispute — Finds Prima Facie Case of Fraud and Irretrievable Injustice. Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked to protect petitioner's interests pending arbitration.

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T), filed an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MSEDCL Tender Process for Composite Power Procurement. Court holds that tender conditions requiring composite bids for thermal and solar power are valid and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Rajesh Sharma, the General Secretary of the Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before th...