Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Possession Based on Prior Possession. The court held that the appellant had established prior possession and dispossession without consent, entitling her to a decree for possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Cian De Souza, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking vacation and peaceful possession of Flat No.4, Habib House, Ground Floor, Ram Nagar, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Byculla, Mumbai, from the respondents, Arun Gunjal and Mrs. Vimal Arun Gunjal. She claimed that she was in exclusive possession of the flat and was dispossessed by the respondents on 7th August 2002. Her mother had been inducted as a tenant by the landlord, Mr. Rajkumar J. Kapur, in February 1970, and the appellant lived with her mother during her lifetime and continued to reside there after her mother's death. The trial court dismissed the suit, leading to this appeal. The High Court, after hearing both sides, allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant had proved her prior possession and dispossession without consent, and thus was entitled to a decree for possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. The court set aside the trial court's order and decreed the suit in favor of the appellant.

Headnote

A) Specific Relief Act - Suit for Possession under Section 6 - Summary Remedy - The suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is a summary proceeding where only prior possession and dispossession without consent need be proved; title is irrelevant. The court held that the appellant had established her prior possession and dispossession on 7th August 2002, and thus was entitled to a decree for possession. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant was entitled to a decree for possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, based on her prior possession and alleged dispossession by the respondents.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The judgment and order of the trial court are set aside. The suit is decreed in favor of the appellant for possession of the suit flat.

Law Points

  • Section 6 of Specific Relief Act
  • 1963
  • Suit for possession based on prior possession
  • Dispossession without consent
  • Summary suit
  • Title not relevant
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (01) 21

APPEAL NO.741 OF 2004 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3335 OF 2002 IN SUIT NO.3741 OF 2002

2006-01-09

R.M. Lodha and Anoop V. Mohta

Mr. Jaideep Mitra i/by Mr. G.C. Mohanty for the appellant; Mr. V.N. Kantawala i/by M/s. Kantawala & Co. for the respondents

Cian De Souza

Arun Gunjal and Mrs. Vimal Arun Gunjal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963

Remedy Sought

Decree for vacation and peaceful possession of the suit flat

Filing Reason

Alleged dispossession by the respondents on 7th August 2002

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed the suit

Issues

Whether the appellant was in prior possession of the suit flat and was dispossessed by the respondents without her consent.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that she was in exclusive possession and was dispossessed on 7th August 2002. Respondents contested the claim of prior possession and dispossession.

Ratio Decidendi

In a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the plaintiff need only prove prior possession and dispossession without consent; title is not relevant. The appellant proved these elements and was entitled to a decree for possession.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant is the original plaintiff and the respondents are the original defendants. The plaintiff filed the suit under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act and prayed for vacation and peaceful possession of the flat.

Procedural History

The appellant filed Suit No.3741 of 2002 under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. The trial court dismissed the suit. The appellant then filed Appeal No.741 of 2004 against that dismissal.

Acts & Sections

  • Specific Relief Act, 1963: 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Strikes Down LIC Circular Imposing Assignment Charge on Finance Organizations as Ultra Vires Section 38 of Insurance Act, 1938. The court held that LIC cannot impose a charge on assignments of life insurance policies in favor of fin...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Possession Based on Prior Possession. The court held that the appellant had established prior possession and dispossession without consent, entitling her to a decree for posse...