Search Results for "Finance Act 1956"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Finance Act 1956"

1273 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1273 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty Orders Against Directors for Non-Deduction of TDS on Interest Paid to Non-Resident — Failure to Comply with Section 195 of Income Tax Act, 1961

21 Aug 2014

The petitioners, Sri A.S. Chinnaswamy Raju and Sri C.S. Sunder Raju, directors of M/s Sunray Computers Pvt. Ltd., challenged two orders dated 14.11.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme, Directs Substitution of Estimated Amount with Tax Dues as Per Adjudicated Order. The court held that for the purpose of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the 'tax dues' refer to the amount determined in the order-in-original, not the show cause notice, even if the order was set aside on appeal.

5 Nov 2020

The three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the respondents' action in issuing forms SVLDRS-2 and SVLDRS-3 unde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows IT Companies to be Classified as Industrial Consumers for Electricity Tariff — BESCOM's Demand for Commercial Tariff Quashed. Software development and IT-enabled services companies engaged in manufacturing activity are entitled to HT 2(A) industrial tariff under the Electricity Act, 2003.

27 Nov 2017

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by IT companies, including Talisma Corporation Private Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions India P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case, Reversing Acquittal Based on Technical Defects in Complaint Format. The Court held that a complaint filed by a company's Managing Director describing himself as such in the cause title, accompanied by a Board Resolution authorizing him to file the complaint, satisfies the requirement under Section 142(a) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, that the complaint must be made by the payee or holder in due course.

10 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from the dishonour of eight cheques totaling Rs. 1,60,000 issued by Dayashankar Prasad Chaurasia in favor of M/s. Bell Marshall Tele...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal Against Termination of Contract in Four-Laning Road Project — Interim Relief Granted Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the appellant had made out a prima facie case and balance of convenience favoured granting interim relief pending arbitration.

5 Apr 2011

The appellant, Srimauli Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., was awarded a contract for four-laning of Osmanabad-Yedshi-Latur-Nanded road by the respondents, Sta...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute — Clause 27.4 Held Valid Arbitration Agreement, Third Party Not Bound. The court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the petitioner and respondents 1 to 4 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but dismissed the petition against respondent No.5 who was not a party to the agreement.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Nitesh Urban Development Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Clause 27.4 of Agreement Held Valid Arbitration Agreement, but Third Party Respondent No.5 Cannot Be Referred to Arbitration.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Nitesh Urban Development Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Deposited Amount in Summary Suit for Recovery of Debt. Plaintiff entitled to withdraw amount deposited by defendant as condition for leave to defend, subject to furnishing security.

9 Mar 2012

The plaintiff, SKF India Ltd., filed a summary suit against the defendant, Banarasi Lal Madan, for recovery of Rs. 1,28,80,060.87 based on invoices, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Court Receiver's 1% Commission on Gross Sale Proceeds in Arbitration Matter — Receiver's Commission Not Subject to Deduction of Expenses. The Court held that the Court Receiver is entitled to 1% commission on the gross sale proceeds without deduction of expenses incurred by the receiver, as per the Bombay High Court (Court Receiver) Rules, 2012.

6 Oct 2015

The appellant, L & T Finance Limited, had advanced a loan of Rs 32,40,000 to AGT Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. for purchase of two vehicles under a loan-cu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Power Trust's Appeal Against CIRP Initiation for Appellant(s), Upholds NCLAT Order Admitting Section 7 IBC Application Due to Default and Non-Compliance with Restructuring Conditions

18 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal challenging the initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) against Hiranmaye Energy Ltd. under...

108 109 110 111 112

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)