Search Results for "group housing project"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "group housing project"

289 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 289 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Involving Cooperative Housing Societies and Developer Over MOFA Compliance. Pleadings Involve Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and Role of District Deputy Registrar.

9 May 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition by Receiver in Slum Rehabilitation Matter — Petition Concerns Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Private Developers Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971; No Legal Holding Discernible from the Extracted Text.

23 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in IHSDP Housing Scheme Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act. Criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 406, 409, 464, 465, 468, 471, 120(B), 34 IPC and Sections 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 quashed as sanction for prosecution was not obtained for public servant co-accused, vitiating the entire prosecution.

9 Jun 2023

The applicants, Girdharilal Madhavdas Ramrakhya, Santosh Sitaram Jaiswal, Nazeemuddin Bashiruddin Shaikh, and Rajesh Santumal Kamra, filed a criminal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Suit for Recovery of Unpaid Amounts and Interest in Construction Contract Dispute. Holds that Delayed Payments Attract Interest Under Section 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Excess Recovery from Mobilisation Advance Must Be Refunded.

28 Jun 2021

The plaintiff, M/s Ajay Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the Maharashtra State Police Housing & Welfare Corporation Ltd. for recovery...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Debenture Trustee Seeking Enforcement of Security Interest Against Developer and Its Directors Under SARFAESI Act — Held That Trustee Is a 'Secured Creditor' Entitled to Take Possession of Mortgaged Property Despite Pending RERA Proceedings.

25 Jun 2021

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, a debenture trustee, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Collector, Pune, and...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Seeks Resolution of Dispute Over Unauthorized Colony in Faridabad Through Arbitration and Committee Formation. The Court directs parties to submit responses on land extent, layout, and development charges to facilitate completion of the project.

3 Oct 2019

The present dispute pertains to the claim of allottees who were not allotted plots on land owned by respondent No.6-Colonizer, Durga Builders Pvt. Ltd...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Writ Petitions Filed Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners Sought Declaration That 1977-78 BDA Land Acquisition Had Lapsed Due to Non-Taking of Possession or Non-Payment of Compensation.

14 Dec 2017

These three sets of writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, all relating to the acquisition of land measuring seven acres in Sur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement Termination. Court Holds That Termination of Development Agreement by Cooperative Housing Society Was Valid and Appellant Failed to Make Out a Prima Facie Case for Interim Protection Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Aug 2016

The appellant, M/s. Amisha Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Developer Removal in Slum Rehabilitation Case Due to Bias — Participation of CEO in Appellate Committee Violates Natural Justice. CEO who passed initial removal order cannot sit as member of High Power Committee hearing appeal against his own order under Slum Rehabilitation Authority regulations.

14 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Susme Builders Private Limited, a developer, was selected by the respondent Co-operative Society in 1986 for redevelopment of its prop...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)