Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Involving Cooperative Housing Societies and Developer Over MOFA Compliance. Pleadings Involve Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and Role of District Deputy Registrar.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-09-07 19:25:20
  • 79
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.165 OF 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (05) 18

Writ Petition No. 165 of 2025

2025-05-09

Atul Ganesh Kulkarni

2025:BHC-AS:21346

Akshay Patil, Devika Madekar, Kalpesh Patil for petitioners; Ashish Kamat, Saket Mone, Shrey Shah, Bhupen Garud for respondent No.1; Mandar Limaye for respondent No.2; Anil V. Anturkar, Kashish Chelani, Vinayak Patil, Swatantri Waghmare for respondent No.3

1. Neelkanth Heights Cooperative Housing Societies Association Ltd., 2. Rameshwar Cooperative Housing Society Limited, 3. Mansarovar Cooperative Housing Society Limited, 4. Girija Cooperative Housing Society Ltd.

1. Abhinav Real Estate Private Limited (now Neelkanth Realtors Private Limited), 2. Thane Municipal Corporation, 3. Sarkawasji Jahangirji, 4. Madhuardas Gokuldas, 5. National Stone Quarry, 6. District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Thane

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963: Section 5A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Cooperative Housing Society Writ Petition Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act Section 5A MOFA Conveyance Deed

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Judicial Officer's Seniority from Date of Continuous Service, Not Regularisation, Under States Reorganisation Act, 1956. Emergency Service Counted for Seniority Because Central Government Decision Allowed It and Kerala Accepted I... 2026-09-09 03:03:38
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Complainant's Appeals in Criminal Summoning Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Sessions Court and High Court Correctly Quashed Summons Against Company Executives as Prima Facie Case Not Made Out Under Sections 427, 447,... 2026-09-09 03:03:31
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition natural justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 benefit of doubt judgment
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Substantive Evi...

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Interim Order in Electricity Act Di...

Lost Your Password?