Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Involving Cooperative Housing Societies and Developer Over MOFA Compliance. Pleadings Involve Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and Role of District Deputy Registrar.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-10-13 00:54:11
  • 95
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.165 OF 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (05) 18

Writ Petition No. 165 of 2025

2025-05-09

Atul Ganesh Kulkarni

2025:BHC-AS:21346

Akshay Patil, Devika Madekar, Kalpesh Patil for petitioners; Ashish Kamat, Saket Mone, Shrey Shah, Bhupen Garud for respondent No.1; Mandar Limaye for respondent No.2; Anil V. Anturkar, Kashish Chelani, Vinayak Patil, Swatantri Waghmare for respondent No.3

1. Neelkanth Heights Cooperative Housing Societies Association Ltd., 2. Rameshwar Cooperative Housing Society Limited, 3. Mansarovar Cooperative Housing Society Limited, 4. Girija Cooperative Housing Society Ltd.

1. Abhinav Real Estate Private Limited (now Neelkanth Realtors Private Limited), 2. Thane Municipal Corporation, 3. Sarkawasji Jahangirji, 4. Madhuardas Gokuldas, 5. National Stone Quarry, 6. District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Thane

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963: Section 5A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Cooperative Housing Society Writ Petition Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act Section 5A MOFA Conveyance Deed

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation Concerning Civic Issues Near Nagpur Railway Station. Court Holds Unhygienic Conditions and Traffic Chaos Violate Right to Life Under Article 21, Issues Directions to Municipal and Police Au... 2026-10-24 09:46:44
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Family Court Case for Convenience. Transfer of case justified due to geographical considerations and convenience for both parties involved. 2026-10-24 09:46:38
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof land acquisition limitation Article 226 Jurisdiction
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Temple Property Gift — Affirms State's Cust...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Charge Framing in Corruption Case — Upholds High ...

Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Deputy Registrar in University Disciplinary Proceedings D...

Lost Your Password?