Search Results for "government order cancellation"

2174 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2174 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Rejection of Workman's Complaint Seeking Cancellation of Recognition of Union. Individual Employee Cannot Initiate Proceedings Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act.

The dispute arose out of a complaint filed by an individual workman, Bharat Jijaba Shinde, purportedly on behalf of 309 out of 400 employees of Force ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Cancellation of Anticipatory Bail for Accused in Murder Case Due to Breach of Condition. Involvement in Subsequent Offence Constitutes Breach of Bail Condition Under Section 439(2) CrPC.

The petitioner, Khajim @ Khajimulla Khan, accused No.3 in Crime No.178/2015 registered at Udayagiri Police Station for offences punishable under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Denying Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Sale Agreement. Recital of Possession in Agreement Not Conclusive When Only 15% Consideration Paid; Refund Admissible Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamps Act, 1958.

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale dated 19 March 2020, by which the petitioners agreed to purchase a flat in Karad, Satara for a total cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates State's Petition for Cancellation of Bail in Kidnapping Case Involving Sitting MLA. The Court Reviews Legality of Sessions Court's Grant of Regular Bail Under Section 439 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 364A, 365 IPC.

The State of Karnataka, through its Special Investigating Team (SIT), CID, preferred a criminal petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution and Consideration of Representation. Delay of Over Five Months in Executing Detention Order and Three Months in Considering Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohd. Kunhi Kallattra, challenged a detention order dated 28.2.2002 issued by the Secretary (Preventive Detenti...