Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Trade Union Registration for Non-Compliance with Audit and Bye-law Requirements under Trade Unions Act, 1926. Industrial Court's order confirming cancellation of registration under Section 10(b) for failure to get accounts audited, maintain proper membership records, and follow bye-laws was upheld.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Solapur District Central Cooperative Bank Employees Union, challenged the order dated 19.07.2016 passed by the Industrial Court, Solapur, which dismissed its appeal and confirmed the order dated 23.10.2012 of the Additional Registrar, Trade Union cancelling its registration under Section 10(b) of the Trade Unions Act, 1926. The respondent No.2, another union, had filed an application on 04.08.2010 alleging various irregularities by the petitioner union, including failure to get accounts audited from an approved auditor from 2002 to 2007 (violation of Section 28), keeping cash exceeding Rs.200 by the General Secretary (violation of bye-law 26), discrepancy in membership numbers between claimed and yearly returns, collecting monthly subscription of Rs.5 instead of Rs.2 as per bye-laws, and appointing Shri B.S. More as General Secretary who was not eligible as he was an Assistant Manager/Deputy Manager. The Additional Registrar issued notices to the petitioner on 20.10.2010 and 10.11.2010, but the petitioner did not appear, leading to a show-cause notice under Section 10(b). The petitioner eventually appeared and filed a reply, but the Additional Registrar, after considering the material, cancelled the registration. The petitioner appealed to the Industrial Court, which dismissed the appeal. The High Court, in its writ jurisdiction, examined whether the Industrial Court erred in confirming the cancellation. The court noted that the petitioner had not complied with the audit requirements under Section 28 for several years, and the other irregularities were also established. The court held that the Registrar has the power to cancel registration under Section 10(b) for non-compliance with the Act and bye-laws. The court found no perversity in the Industrial Court's order and dismissed the petition, upholding the cancellation of registration.

Headnote

A) Trade Union Law - Cancellation of Registration - Section 10(b) Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Non-compliance with audit requirements under Section 28 - The petitioner union failed to get its accounts audited from an approved auditor for the years 2002 to 2007, constituting a contravention of Section 28 of the Act. The Industrial Court confirmed the cancellation of registration, holding that the Registrar has power to cancel registration for such non-compliance. (Paras 2-5)

B) Trade Union Law - Membership Records - Section 28 Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Discrepancy in membership numbers - The petitioner union claimed a certain number of members but the yearly returns showed a different number, indicating failure to maintain proper records. This was a valid ground for cancellation under Section 10(b). (Paras 3-5)

C) Trade Union Law - Bye-law Violations - Section 10(b) Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Collection of subscription in excess of bye-law limit - The petitioner union collected monthly subscription of Rs.5 instead of Rs.2 as per its bye-laws, and the General Secretary held cash exceeding Rs.200 in violation of bye-law 26. These irregularities justified cancellation of registration. (Paras 3-5)

D) Trade Union Law - Eligibility of Office Bearers - Section 10(b) Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Appointment of ineligible person as General Secretary - The petitioner union appointed Shri B.S. More as General Secretary despite him being an Assistant Manager/Deputy Manager and not entitled to membership under the bye-laws. This was a valid ground for cancellation. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Industrial Court erred in dismissing the appeal against the order of the Additional Registrar cancelling the registration of the petitioner union under Section 10(b) of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 for alleged irregularities including non-audit of accounts, incorrect membership records, and violation of bye-laws

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the order of the Industrial Court and the cancellation of the petitioner union's registration under Section 10(b) of the Trade Unions Act, 1926.

Law Points

  • Cancellation of trade union registration under Section 10(b) of Trade Unions Act
  • 1926 is justified for non-compliance with audit requirements under Section 28
  • failure to maintain proper membership records
  • and violation of bye-laws regarding subscription and eligibility of office bearers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (09) 54

WRIT PETITION NO.9311 OF 2016

2016-09-27

R. M. SAVANT, J.

Shri. S. C. Naidu i/by Shri. N. G. Helekar for the Petitioner; Ms. Nayana Buch i/by Shri. S. K. More for the Respondent No.2

Solapur District Central Cooperative Bank Employees Union, Solapur (The Solapur Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari Bank Karmachari Sanghatana)

1. Addl. Labour Commissioner (I/C), Addl. Registrar, Trade Union, Pune Division Pune; 2. The Solapur Zilla Sahakari Bank Karmachari Sanghtana

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court dismissing appeal against cancellation of trade union registration

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the order dated 19.07.2016 of the Industrial Court and the order dated 23.10.2012 of the Additional Registrar cancelling its registration

Filing Reason

The petitioner union's registration was cancelled by the Additional Registrar on grounds of irregularities including non-audit of accounts, membership discrepancies, and bye-law violations

Previous Decisions

The Additional Registrar, Trade Union cancelled the registration of the petitioner union on 23.10.2012; the Industrial Court dismissed the appeal on 19.07.2016

Issues

Whether the Industrial Court erred in dismissing the appeal against the cancellation of registration under Section 10(b) of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 Whether the alleged irregularities such as non-audit of accounts, membership discrepancies, and bye-law violations were sufficient grounds for cancellation

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Industrial Court failed to consider that the irregularities were not serious and that the cancellation was disproportionate Respondent No.2 supported the cancellation, arguing that the petitioner had contravened the Act and bye-laws

Ratio Decidendi

The Registrar has the power under Section 10(b) of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 to cancel the registration of a trade union for non-compliance with the provisions of the Act, including failure to get accounts audited under Section 28, maintaining incorrect membership records, and violating bye-laws. The Industrial Court's confirmation of such cancellation was not perverse and did not warrant interference in writ jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

The writ jurisdiction of this Court is invoked against the order dated 19.07.2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court, Solapur, by which order, the Appeal filed by the Petitioner being Appeal (ICTU) No.01 of 2012 came to be dismissed and resultantly, the order dated 23.10.2012 passed by the Respondent No.1 herein i.e. the Additional Registrar, Trade Union/Additional Labour Commissioner came to be confirmed. The facts giving rise to the above Petition can in brief be stated thus: The Respondent No.2 herein and the Petitioner are Unions operating in the Solapur District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., Solapur.

Procedural History

On 04.08.2010, Respondent No.2 filed an application before the Registrar of Trade Unions seeking cancellation of the petitioner union's registration. The Additional Registrar issued notices on 20.10.2010 and 10.11.2010, and later a show-cause notice under Section 10(b). After considering the reply, the Additional Registrar cancelled the registration on 23.10.2012. The petitioner appealed to the Industrial Court, which dismissed the appeal on 19.07.2016. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition in the High Court, which was dismissed on 27.09.2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade Unions Act, 1926: Section 10(b), Section 28
  • Maharashtra Trade Union Regulations, 1927:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Trade Union Registration for Non-Compliance with Audit and Bye-law Requirements under Trade Unions Act, 1926. Industrial Court's order confirming cancellation of registration under Sect...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Wife to Cross-Examine Husband in Family Court Proceedings. Right to Cross-Examine on Affidavit-Evidence Upheld Despite Delay.