Search Results for "electronic filing"

578 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 578 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Employer's Writ for ABRY Scheme Benefits — Late ECR Filing Not Fatal to Claim. Clause 5 of ABRY Scheme 3.0 Interpreted as Directory, and Baseline Employees Cannot Be Reduced Retrospectively by EPFO.

The petitioner, Lakshmi Electrical Drives Corporate Services LLP, a manpower services provider in Tamil Nadu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Removal of Petitioner's Name from Digital Records in Quashed Criminal Case — Right to be Forgotten Upheld. Petitioner's Right to Privacy under Article 21 Prevails Over Public Access to Quashed Proceedings.

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Registrar General of the High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Unpaid Rent, Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend. Triable issues raised regarding termination of lease and liability of partners under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The plaintiff, PVR Ltd., filed a Commercial Summary Suit against the defendants, Proetus Ventures LLP and its partners, Shardul Bayas and Abhinay Rame...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision of GST TRAN-1 to Claim Transitional Credit Due to Technical Glitch. Petitioner permitted to file revised FORM GST TRAN-1 under Section 140(8) of CGST Act, 2017 to correct inadvertent error in transferring credit to branch.

The petitioner, M/S Atria Convergence Technologies Ltd, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Central Goods and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Applications Challenging Magistrate's Orders in Private Complaint Cases — Reiterates Limited Scope of Revision Against Interlocutory Orders Under Section 397 CrPC. Order Issuing Process Under Section 204 CrPC is Interlocutory and Not Subject to Revision.

The judgment involves multiple criminal applications filed before the Bombay High Court challenging orders passed by Magistrates issuing process again...