Karnataka High Court Allows Revision of GST TRAN-1 to Claim Transitional Credit Due to Technical Glitch. Petitioner permitted to file revised FORM GST TRAN-1 under Section 140(8) of CGST Act, 2017 to correct inadvertent error in transferring credit to branch.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 34
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/S Atria Convergence Technologies Ltd, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, had prior to the introduction of GST been registered under the Finance Act, 1994 for Central Excise and Service Tax. While submitting FORM GST TRAN-1 to carry forward the unreleased Cenvat credit, the petitioner inadvertently transferred a portion of the credit to its branch in Hyderabad due to a technical glitch. Upon realizing the error, the petitioner sought to file a revised TRAN-1 but was unable to do so as the system did not permit revision. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents to allow the filing of a revised FORM GST TRAN-1 to avail the eligible credit in its electronic credit ledger. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that the error was inadvertent and due to a technical glitch. The court directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to file a revised FORM GST TRAN-1 within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order, and upon such filing, the respondents were directed to process the same and enable the credit in the electronic credit ledger. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Goods and Services Tax - Transitional Credit - FORM GST TRAN-1 - Technical Glitch - The petitioner inadvertently transferred a portion of Cenvat credit to its Hyderabad branch while filing FORM GST TRAN-1 due to a technical glitch. The court held that the petitioner should be permitted to file a revised TRAN-1 to correct the error and avail the eligible credit, as the system did not allow revision. (Paras 1-5)

B) Goods and Services Tax - Section 140(8) of CGST Act, 2017 - Transitional Provisions - The court directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to file a revised FORM GST TRAN-1 within two weeks, and upon filing, the respondents were directed to process the same and enable the credit in the electronic credit ledger. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner can be allowed to file a revised FORM GST TRAN-1 to avail eligible transitional credit when the original filing contained an inadvertent error due to a technical glitch.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of. The respondents are directed to permit the petitioner to file a revised FORM GST TRAN-1 within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order. Upon filing, the respondents shall process the same and enable the credit in the electronic credit ledger.

Law Points

  • Transitional credit under GST
  • FORM GST TRAN-1
  • technical glitch
  • revision of returns
  • Section 140(8) of CGST Act
  • 2017
  • Rule 117 of CGST Rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (03) 12

Writ Petition No.55914/2018 (T – RES)

2019-03-28

S. Sujatha

Sri Anil Kumar.B for petitioner; Sri Jeevan J. Neeralagi for respondents 1-3, 6 & 7; Sri Vikram A Huilgol, HCGP for respondents 4 & 5

M/S Atria Convergence Technologies Ltd

Union of India, GST Council, GSTN Chairman, Commissioner GST (Jurisdictional), Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to allow filing of revised FORM GST TRAN-1.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to allow the petitioner to file a revised FORM GST TRAN-1 to avail eligible credit in its electronic credit ledger.

Filing Reason

Petitioner inadvertently transferred a portion of Cenvat credit to its Hyderabad branch while filing FORM GST TRAN-1 due to a technical glitch, and the system did not allow revision.

Issues

Whether the petitioner can be allowed to file a revised FORM GST TRAN-1 to correct an inadvertent error due to a technical glitch.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the error was inadvertent and due to a technical glitch, and the system did not permit revision of TRAN-1. Respondents opposed the petition, but the court found merit in the petitioner's case.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a taxpayer inadvertently makes an error in filing FORM GST TRAN-1 due to a technical glitch, the taxpayer should be permitted to file a revised TRAN-1 to correct the error and avail the eligible transitional credit, as the system does not allow revision otherwise.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner while submitting his FORM GST TRAN-1 inter alia to enable the unreleased Cenvat Credit from the earlier credit to carry forward, inadvertently said to have been transferred a portion of the credit to their branch in Hyderabad [Telangana]. The respondents are directed to permit the petitioner to file a revised FORM GST TRAN-1 within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order. On such filing, the respondents shall process the same and enable the credit in the electronic credit ledger.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The petition came up for preliminary hearing and was disposed of on 28 March 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017: Section 140(8)
  • Finance Act, 1994:
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Revision of GST TRAN-1 to Claim Transitional Credit Due to Technical Glitch. Petitioner permitted to file revised FORM GST TRAN-1 under Section 140(8) of CGST Act, 2017 to correct inadvertent error in transferring credit t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order in Tenancy Matter — Purchase Certificate Under Section 32M Upheld Despite Delay in Section 32F Application. The court held that the application under Section 32F of the Bombay Tenancy and...