High Court of Karnataka Allows Removal of Petitioner's Name from Digital Records in Quashed Criminal Case — Right to be Forgotten Upheld. Petitioner's Right to Privacy under Article 21 Prevails Over Public Access to Quashed Proceedings.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 111
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Registrar General of the High Court of Karnataka to remove his name from the digital records maintained in Criminal Petition No.8172 of 2021, and to direct Google India Pvt. Ltd. and Indian Kanoon.com not to reflect his name in relation to that case. The petitioner had been involved in a criminal case which was subsequently quashed by the High Court. Despite the quashing, the petitioner's name continued to appear in digital records and on search engines, causing him stigma and affecting his reputation. The court heard the petitioner's counsel, Smt. Abhinaya K., and the respondents' counsel. The court analyzed the concept of the right to be forgotten as an aspect of the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution. It noted that once the criminal proceedings were quashed, there was no justification for the petitioner's name to remain in the public domain. The court directed the Registrar General to remove the petitioner's name from the digital records of Criminal Petition No.8172/2021 and directed Google India Pvt. Ltd. and Indian Kanoon.com to delist or remove any references to the petitioner in connection with that case. The court held that the right to be forgotten is a facet of the right to privacy and must be protected, especially when the underlying proceedings have been terminated in favor of the individual.

Headnote

A) Right to Privacy - Right to be Forgotten - Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Petitioner sought removal of his name from digital records of a quashed criminal case - Court held that the right to be forgotten is an inherent facet of the right to privacy under Article 21, and once criminal proceedings are quashed, the petitioner is entitled to have his name removed from public digital records to prevent continued stigma and infringement of privacy (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a petitioner whose criminal proceedings have been quashed is entitled to have his name removed from digital records of the court and from search engines to protect his right to privacy and the right to be forgotten.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and directed the Registrar General to remove the petitioner's name from the digital records of Criminal Petition No.8172/2021. It further directed Google India Pvt. Ltd. and Indian Kanoon.com to delist or remove any references to the petitioner in connection with that case.

Law Points

  • Right to be Forgotten
  • Right to Privacy
  • Article 21 of the Constitution of India
  • Information Technology Act
  • 2000
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • 1973
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (KAR) (02) 15

Writ Petition No.25557 of 2023 (GM - RES)

2024-02-28

M. Nagaprasanna

Smt. Abhinaya K. for petitioner; Smt. B.V. Vidyulatha for R1; Sri Kiran Kumar, HCGP for R-2

Mr. XXXX

The Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka; The State of Karnataka; Authorized Officer, Google India Pvt. Ltd.; Authorized Officer, Indian Kanoon.com

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking removal of petitioner's name from digital records of a quashed criminal case and from search engines.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the Registrar General to remove petitioner's name from digital records of Criminal Petition No.8172/2021 and to Google India and Indian Kanoon to not reflect petitioner's name in relation to that case.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's name continued to appear in digital records and search engines despite the criminal case being quashed, causing stigma and infringement of privacy.

Previous Decisions

Criminal Petition No.8172/2021 was quashed by the High Court on 02.02.2022.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to removal of his name from digital records of a quashed criminal case under the right to be forgotten. Whether the right to be forgotten is a facet of the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that continued appearance of his name in digital records despite quashing of the case violates his right to privacy and causes stigma. Respondents did not oppose the prayer; the court considered the submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to be forgotten is an inherent facet of the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution. Once criminal proceedings are quashed, the individual is entitled to have his name removed from public digital records to prevent continued stigma and infringement of privacy.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction to the Registry of this Court to remove the name of the petitioner from the digital records maintained in Criminal Petition No.8172 of 2021...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.8172/2021 which was quashed on 02.02.2022. Thereafter, the petitioner filed the present writ petition on 14.02.2024 seeking removal of his name from digital records. The petition was reserved for orders on 14.02.2024 and pronounced on 28.02.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 21, 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Amputation Victim — Tribunal's Lump-Sum Compensation Set Aside for Failure to Award Under Separate Heads Including Artificial Limb and Loss of Marriage Prospects. The Court Remanded th...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Removal of Petitioner's Name from Digital Records in Quashed Criminal Case — Right to be Forgotten Upheld. Petitioner's Right to Privacy under Article 21 Prevails Over Public Access to Quashed Proceedings.