Search Results for "arbitrator substitution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitrator substitution"

209 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 209 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Arbitrator's failure to consider vital evidence and crucial documents renders award patently illegal and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Ci...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of arbitrator in joint development dispute after earlier award rejected specific performance. The court considers whether the claim for damages is barred by res judicata, following the Supreme Court's direction that such issue is for the arbitral tribunal.

29 Jul 2022

Background: The dispute arose out of a series of joint development agreements entered into between the petitioners (developers) and the father of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Finding of Waiver of Right to Object to Time Extension in Arbitration Proceedings. Held that Participation in Proceedings Without Insisting on Time Limit Constitutes Waiver of Right to Object to Extension of Time.

27 Aug 2019

The appeal arises from a dispute between partners of a partnership firm (appellants) and a company (respondent) regarding an arbitration agreement dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Arbitration Award Challenge — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 9% per Annum. Section 31(7)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 mandates that in absence of contractual stipulation, pendente lite and future interest shall be at 2% higher than current rate of interest.

2 Dec 2022

The appellant, M/s Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Limited, an automobile manufacturer, appointed the respondent, M/s Commercial Auto Products Pri...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicated Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Final Verdict Not Stated in Provided Excerpt. Petition Raised Issues of Necessary Parties and Interpretation of Payment Obligations Under Supply Agreement and Multi-Party Agreement Clauses 5.4.2, C, and D.

4 Aug 2025

The judgment dealt with a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court o...

High Court

APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995

16 Dec 2005

The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Refer Dispute to Arbitration in Bank Guarantee Case — Arbitration Agreement Survives Despite Non-Signature of Work Order. The court held that an arbitration agreement need not be signed if there is sufficient evidence of mutual acceptance, and the work order was acted upon by both parties.

30 Sep 2020

The petitioner, M/s Indo Unique Flame Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 18th January 2018 passed by the Commercial Court, Nagpur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Bank Guarantee Dispute. Court upholds restraint on encashment of bank guarantee subject to deposit of amount, finding no perversity in the Tribunal's order under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

25 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mahaguj Collieries Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considered Extension of Arbitral Tribunal Mandate Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Chenab Bridge Project Dispute. The Court Analyzed Objections Regarding Tribunal's Procedural Decisions and Delay While Examining Whether to Extend the Mandate of the Standing Arbitral Tribunal Until December 31, 2026.

9 Jun 2025

The dispute arose from a contract dated November 24, 2004 for the design and construction of a special rail bridge across the river Chenab on the Katr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Extension of Arbitrator's Mandate Under Section 29A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Even After Award Rendered Beyond Statutory Time Limit -- Court Reverses High Court Decision Setting Aside Award

3 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's orders, holding that a court can entertain an application under Section 29A(5) of ...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)