Search Results for "agricultural land ceiling"

264 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 264 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Revenue Entry — Petitioner's Name to Continue in Revenue Records. Revisional Authority Failed to Consider Bona Fide Purchase Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The petitioner, Sintex Power Limited, purchased agricultural land in Village Lunsapur, Taluka Jafrabad, District Amreli, Gujarat, comprising Survey No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 &

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Validly Taken Under Section 10(5) of ULC Act Before Repeal. Application Under Section 21 Was Barred by Limitation, and Repeal Did Not Affect Lands Where Possession Was Already Taken.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The appellants, legal representatives...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Ceiling Act Case — Customary Divorce Not Proven, Civil Suit Barred. High Court Erred in Interfering with Concurrent Findings and Ignoring Bar of Jurisdiction Under Section 46 of Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh which allowed a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Dungaji, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Issued After Eight Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Tukaram S/o Gopalrao Nakate, a resident of Hadgaon, District Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Suo Moto Notice. Additional Commissioner's Power Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, Not After 17 Years.

The petitioner, Shantabai Sundarrao Deshmukh, is the legal representative of Sundarrao Rangrao Deshmukh, who died on 31.01.1989. The husband of the pe...