Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 &

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 175
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 &

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 183

Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 & WMP.No.5474 of 2025

2025-03-26

N. Anand Venkatesh

2025:MHC:790

N.S.Krishnamoorthi, Maruthamuthu, V.Rajendiran, S.Subramani

The District Collector, Krishnagiri District; The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri; The Revenue Tahsildar, Tenkanikottai Taluk; The District Collector, Tirupur District; The Revenue Tahsildar, Madathukulam; The Village Administrative Officer, Kadathur Village; The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai District; The District Revenue Officer, Tiruvannamalai; The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvannamalai; The Tahsildar, Tiruvannamalai Taluk; The District Collector, Tirupur; The Tahsildar, Kangeyam

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for grant of patta for grama natham lands

Remedy Sought

WP 4936/2025: Certiorarified Mandamus to quash order dated 31.12.2024 and grant patta for lands in S.F.Nos.1380/17 and 1380/27, Thenkanikottai; other petitions for Mandamus to consider representation dated 24.12.2024 and grant natham patta

Procedural History

Petitions filed under Article 226, heard and reserved on 18.3.2025, judgment delivered on 26.3.2025

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Attempt to Murder Case Against Husband Based on Compromise Between Spouses — Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC Invoked to Quash Non-Compoundable Offence in Matrimonial Dispute. The court held that where the complainan...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Electricity Companies in Banana Crop Damage Case. Negligence in Maintenance of High Voltage Lines Leads to Compensation for Loss of 20,500 Plants.