Search Results for "MRTP Act reservation"

300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development Plan Reservation and TDR Compensation in Kolhapur. Court upholds reservation of land for playground and finds that TDR is valid compensation under MRTP Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by M/s. Bhima Mahabharat Builders and Developers, Zakir Nasirruddin Peerzade, and Anand rao Mahadeo M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Metro Line 4 Alignment and Land Acquisition by Private Landowners. Petitioners Contend That MMRDA Lacks Authority Under Metro Railways Act, 1978 and That Acquisition Under MRTP Act Is Invalid Without Environmental Clearances.

Two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the implementation and alignment of Metro Railway Line No.4 (ML-4) in Mumbai. P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Second Appeal Against Concurrent Decrees Declaring Lapse of Land Reservation. Issues of Lapsing Under Section 127 of MRTP Act and Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 149 Argued.

This second appeal arose from concurrent judgments and decrees of lower courts declaring that the reservation on the suit property, owned by the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Deemed Lapse of Land Reservation for High School and Playground Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966. Failure to Acquire Land Within Prescribed Period Results in Lapse of Reservation and Entitlement to Develop Land as Per Adjacent Permissible Use.

The petitioners, four private limited companies, owned a plot of land bearing Survey No.42/1+2/2/5 admeasuring 7652 sq. meters at Nashik. The land was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, landowners of Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza Gondia (Bk), challenged the reservation No. S169 in the Final D...