Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Release Land from Reservation Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Reservation Lapses Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period. The court held that the petitioner's land, reserved for playground and primary school since 1994, became free from reservation after the planning authority failed to acquire it within 12 months of the purchase notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Lalchand s/o Hemandas Sainani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the refusal of the Amalner Municipal Council (respondent no. 4) to release his land from reservation. The land, gut no. 419/1 admeasuring 393.22 sq. mtrs. within Amalner Municipal Council limits, was reserved for a playground and primary school in the second revised development plan sanctioned on 30.04.1994. The petitioner claimed ownership and title to the property, supported by a 7/12 extract. Despite the lapse of over 20 years, the planning authority took no steps to acquire the land. Consequently, the petitioner issued a notice dated 19.01.2015 under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act), calling upon the authority to acquire the land or release it from reservation. The respondent no. 4 failed to take any action within the statutory period of 12 months from the date of the notice. The petitioner sought a declaration that the reservation had lapsed and the land was free from all reservations. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the reservation had indeed lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act. The court noted that the planning authority did not acquire the land or initiate any acquisition proceedings within the prescribed period. Therefore, the court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation on the petitioner's land had lapsed and the land was free from all reservations. The respondents were directed to act accordingly and modify the development plan to reflect the change. The court also ordered that the petitioner be entitled to use the land as per the permissible use in the zone.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Lapsing of Reservation - Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Purchase Notice - The petitioner, owner of land reserved for playground and primary school in the revised development plan of 1994, issued a notice under Section 127 on 19.01.2015 after 20 years of no acquisition steps. The court held that since the planning authority failed to acquire the land or take steps within 12 months of the notice, the reservation lapsed and the land became free from reservation. (Paras 2-8)

B) Town Planning - Obligation of Planning Authority - Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Failure to Acquire - The court held that the planning authority's inaction for over 20 years and failure to respond to the purchase notice resulted in the deemed lapse of reservation. The land is now free from all reservations and the petitioner is entitled to use it as per the permissible use in the zone. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land for a playground and primary school has lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, due to the failure of the planning authority to acquire the land within the statutory period after service of a purchase notice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, declaring that the reservation on the petitioner's land (gut no. 419/1) has lapsed and the land is free from all reservations. The respondents were directed to act accordingly and modify the development plan. The petitioner is entitled to use the land as per the permissible use in the zone.

Law Points

  • Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act
  • 1966
  • lapsing of reservation
  • purchase notice
  • deemed lapse
  • obligation of planning authority to acquire within prescribed period
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 9

Writ Petition No. 6416 of 2016

2017-07-31

S.C. Dharmadhikari, Mangesh S. Patil

Mr. J.R. Shah for Petitioner, Mr. A.R. Kale AGP for Respondents/State, Mr. G.V. Wani for Respondent No.4

Lalchand s/o Hemandas Sainani

The State of Maharashtra, Director of Town Planning & Valuation Department, Maharashtra State, Pune, The Assistant Director, Town Planning, Jalgaon, Amalner Municipal Council, Amalner, District Jalgaon

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the refusal of the municipal council to release land from reservation under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that the reservation on the petitioner's land for playground and primary school has lapsed and the land is free from all reservations.

Filing Reason

The planning authority failed to acquire the land reserved in the development plan of 1994 despite the lapse of over 20 years and after the petitioner issued a notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act.

Issues

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land has lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 due to non-acquisition within the statutory period after service of purchase notice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the land was reserved since 1994, no steps were taken for acquisition, and after serving notice under Section 127, the authority failed to act within 12 months, resulting in lapse of reservation. Respondents did not oppose the petition and conceded that no acquisition steps were taken.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, if a planning authority fails to acquire land reserved in a development plan within 12 months of receiving a purchase notice from the owner, the reservation lapses and the land becomes free from all reservations. The owner is then entitled to use the land as per the permissible use in the zone.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the refusal of the Amalner Municipal Council, Amalner, District Jalgaon to release the land from reservation. The petitioner claims a declaration that land bearing gut no. 419/1 ad-measuring 393.22 sq.mtr situated within Amalner Municipal Council limits, reserved for play ground and primary school in the second revised development plan dated 30.04.1994 is free and the designation or reservation has lapsed. Though, twenty years have lapsed, no steps were taken by the respondent no. 4 to acquire this land which has been reserved for primary school and play ground. In such circumstances, the petitioner issued a notice dated 19.01.2015 under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 calling upon the respondent no.4 to acquire the land.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 6416 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the refusal of the Amalner Municipal Council to release land from reservation. The court issued rule and heard the matter finally with consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 127
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Release Land from Reservation Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Reservation Lapses Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period. The court held that the petition...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and House Trespass in Brutal Stabbing Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 302 and 452 IPC for entering victim's room and inflicting fatal stab wounds, with co-accused acquitted.