Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

331 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 331 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order for Provisional Release of Seized iPhones. Ownership Dispute Precludes Release Under Section 110A of Customs Act, 1962.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, appealed against an order dated 23 June 2022 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cenvat Credit on Input Services for Sugar Manufacturing Upheld. Transportation of Sugarcane from Farm to Factory Gate Held as Input Service Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

The Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs, Belgaum) appealed against the Final Order No.20105/2014 dated 28.1.2014 passed by the CESTAT, Ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Credit Case for Residential Colony Services. Services for repair, maintenance and civil construction in factory residential colony are 'input service' under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai dated 4-12-2007, raising the qu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of DEEC Shipping Bill to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 Mandates Prior Denial of DEEC Benefit by DGFT or Customs Authorities, Which Was Not Established.

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Assessee Passed on Duty Incidence to Customers, Refund Claim Rejected. Section 12B of Central Excise Act, 1944 bars refund if duty burden shifted to others.

The appellant, M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing passenger utility vehicles and parts thereof, which are excisable under C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Customs Appeal Due to Bona Fide Prosecution Before Wrong Forum. The Court held that the period spent before the revisionary authority under a bona fide belief should be condoned, and the CESTAT erred in rejecting the application.

The appellant, Zulfikar Abdul Rashid Khan, is a businessman dealing in motor vehicles and parts. A show cause notice dated 12 August 2011 was issued u...