High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cenvat Credit on Input Services for Sugar Manufacturing Upheld. Transportation of Sugarcane from Farm to Factory Gate Held as Input Service Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs, Belgaum) appealed against the Final Order No.20105/2014 dated 28.1.2014 passed by the CESTAT, Bangalore, which had set aside the demand for recovery of Cenvat Credit of Rs.22,31,610/- and service tax of Rs.15,36,051/- along with interest and penalty. The respondent, M/s. Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd., a sugar manufacturer, had availed Cenvat Credit on service tax paid on GTA (Goods Transport Agency) services for transportation of sugarcane from the farm to the factory gate. The Adjudicating Authority had confirmed the demand vide Order in Original No.11/2006 ADC dated 31.10.2006, but the CESTAT allowed the respondent's appeal. The Revenue challenged this before the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The High Court, at the admission stage, noted that the issue was covered by two judgments: Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh vs. Nahar Industrial Enterprises Limited (STR-2012-25-129) of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and a Delhi High Court decision. Following these precedents, the High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that transportation of sugarcane is an integral part of the manufacturing process and qualifies as input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Headnote

A) Central Excise - Cenvat Credit - Input Service - GTA Service - Transportation of Sugarcane - The issue was whether service tax paid on GTA services for transportation of sugarcane from farm to factory gate is eligible as Cenvat Credit under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - The High Court held that the transportation of sugarcane is an essential part of the manufacturing process of sugar and thus qualifies as input service - The appeal was dismissed as the issue was covered by earlier decisions of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and Delhi High Court (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent is entitled to Cenvat Credit of service tax paid on GTA services for transportation of sugarcane from the farm to the factory gate, as an input service used in or in relation to the manufacture of sugar.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the issue is covered by earlier judgments of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and Delhi High Court, and thus no substantial question of law arises.

Law Points

  • Cenvat Credit
  • Input Service
  • GTA Service
  • Transportation of Sugarcane
  • Manufacturing Process
  • Central Excise Act
  • 1944
  • Finance Act
  • 1994
  • Cenvat Credit Rules
  • 2004
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (10) 15

Central Excise Appeal No.100011/2014

2015-10-05

Anand Byrareddy, S. Sujatha

Shri Gangadhar S. Hosakeri (for appellant), Shri R.M. Kulkarni (for respondent)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs, Belgaum

M/s. Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd., Sameerwadi, Bagalkot

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by Revenue against CESTAT order allowing Cenvat Credit on GTA services for transportation of sugarcane.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside CESTAT order and confirm demand for recovery of Cenvat Credit and service tax with interest and penalty.

Filing Reason

Revenue aggrieved by CESTAT order setting aside demand for Cenvat Credit and service tax.

Previous Decisions

Adjudicating Authority confirmed demand vide Order in Original No.11/2006 ADC dated 31.10.2006; CESTAT set aside that order vide Final Order No.20105/2014 dated 28.1.2014.

Issues

Whether Cenvat Credit on service tax paid on GTA services for transportation of sugarcane from farm to factory gate is allowable as input service under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue argued that the transportation of sugarcane is not an input service used in or in relation to manufacture. Respondent contended that transportation of sugarcane is integral to the manufacturing process of sugar.

Ratio Decidendi

Transportation of sugarcane from farm to factory gate is an essential part of the manufacturing process of sugar and qualifies as input service under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, entitling the manufacturer to Cenvat Credit on service tax paid on GTA services.

Judgment Excerpts

The matter coming up for admission is considered for final disposal as the hierarchy of authorities have arrived at a finding that the issue stands covered by two judgments, of the Punjab and Haryana High Court as well as the Delhi High Court in the cases of Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh vs. Nahar Industrial Enterprises Limited, STR-2012-25-129.

Procedural History

Adjudicating Authority confirmed demand on 31.10.2006; CESTAT set aside demand on 28.1.2014; Revenue appealed to High Court under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944; High Court dismissed appeal on 5.10.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944: 35G
  • Finance Act, 1994: 76
  • Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004: Rule 2(l), Rule 15(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Divorce Appeal and Upholds Wife's Restitution of Conjugal Rights — Cruelty Not Proven, Maintenance Granted. Husband failed to prove cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; wife entitled to ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to LPG Distributorship Allotment — Land Offered by Successful Applicant Was Separate Parcel, No Disqualification Under Guidelines. The Court upheld the allotment to the 4th respondent, finding that the land leased ...