Search Results for "Temple Dispute"

1430 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1430 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Directs Inclusion of No-Fault Liability Payment. Tribunal's Award Modified to Reflect Rs.50,000 Already Paid Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Babu @ Balu Narsingrao Pathak, owner of the vehicle involved in a motor accident, filed an appeal against the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, convicting the appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court Order for Retrenchment Compensation Under Section 33(c)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer Liable Despite Nationalization and Transfer of Undertaking.

The petitioner, Empress Mills (a unit of Maharashtra State Textile Corporation), challenged an order dated 14.12.1998 passed by the First Labour Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Rape Case — Medical Evidence and Victim Testimony Corroborate Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC for rape of a 13-year-old girl in a shop confirmed, with sentence of 7 years RI and fine.

The appellant, Arvind Bhagwant Datal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 376 and 342 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Nirmala Maruti Gunjal, Malanbai Ramesh Gunjal, Sakhubai Baban Shinde, and Maruti Ramesh Gunjal, were convicted by the 5th Additional S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Development Agreement in Favor of Purchasers. Agreement for Development Treated as Agreement for Sale Under Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Essential Terms Constitute Sale of Immovable Property.

The appellants, original defendants, were the owners of a property in Pune. They executed a development agreement dated 18th October 2007 in favor of ...