Bombay High Court Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Directs Inclusion of No-Fault Liability Payment. Tribunal's Award Modified to Reflect Rs.50,000 Already Paid Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Babu @ Balu Narsingrao Pathak, owner of the vehicle involved in a motor accident, filed an appeal against the judgment and award dated 7 August 2007 passed by the Ad-hoc District Judge-4 and Ad-hoc Member, MACT, Amravati in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.159 of 2002. The Tribunal had partly allowed the claim petition filed by the respondents (Smt. Bharti wd/o Gajanan Mohod and her minor children) and directed the appellant to pay Rs.1,79,800 with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization. The only challenge raised by the appellant's counsel, Mr. J.Y. Ghorde, was that the Tribunal failed to include the amount of Rs.50,000 already paid by the appellant towards no-fault liability under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The counsel argued that the award should have directed payment of Rs.1,79,800 inclusive of the Rs.50,000 already paid. The respondents' counsel, Mr. C.J. Dhumane, did not dispute that the amount had been paid. The Court, after hearing both sides, admitted the appeal and held that the amount of Rs.50,000 paid under no-fault liability must be adjusted against the total compensation. The Court directed the Tribunal to modify the award by including the said amount and to pass appropriate orders. The appeal was allowed in those terms.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - No-Fault Liability - Section 140 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Adjustment of Interim Payment - The appellant, owner of the vehicle, challenged the Tribunal's award for not deducting Rs.50,000 already paid as no-fault liability. The Court held that the amount paid under Section 140 must be adjusted against the final compensation, and directed the Tribunal to modify the award accordingly. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the amount of Rs.50,000 paid by the appellant towards no-fault liability under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 should be included in the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The Tribunal is directed to modify the award by including the amount of Rs.50,000 already paid by the appellant towards no-fault liability and pass appropriate orders.

Law Points

  • No-fault liability payment must be deducted from total compensation
  • Section 140 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Compensation adjustment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 215

First Appeal No.1158 of 2007

2010-01-12

R. K. Deshpande

Mr. J. Y. Ghorde for appellant, Mr. C. J. Dhumane for respondent nos. 1 to 3

Babu @ Balu s/o. Narsingrao Pathak

Smt. Bharti wd/o. Gajanan Mohod, Ku. Sarika d/o. Gajanan Mohod, Chaitan s/o. Gajanan Mohod

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought modification of award to include Rs.50,000 already paid as no-fault liability

Filing Reason

Tribunal did not deduct the amount of Rs.50,000 paid under no-fault liability from the compensation awarded

Previous Decisions

MACT, Amravati partly allowed claim petition and awarded Rs.1,79,800 with interest

Issues

Whether the amount of Rs.50,000 paid towards no-fault liability should be adjusted against the compensation awarded by the Tribunal

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Tribunal ought to have directed payment of Rs.1,79,800 inclusive of Rs.50,000 already paid Respondents did not dispute that the amount of Rs.50,000 was paid

Ratio Decidendi

The amount paid under no-fault liability under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 must be adjusted against the total compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Judgment Excerpts

The only challenge raised by Mr.Ghorde, Adv. is about non-inclusion of an amount of Rs.50,000/- paid by the appellants towards no fault liability. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents does not dispute that an amount of Rs.50,000/- has been paid by the appellant towards no fault liability.

Procedural History

The appellant filed First Appeal No.1158 of 2007 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the judgment and award dated 7 August 2007 of the Ad-hoc District Judge-4 and Ad-hoc Member, MACT, Amravati in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.159 of 2002. Notice was issued on 11 January 2008, and parties appeared. By consent, the matter was taken up for final hearing and admitted.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 140
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Directs Inclusion of No-Fault Liability Payment. Tribunal's Award Modified to Reflect Rs.50,000 Already Paid Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against City Civil Court's Order Holding Lack of Jurisdiction in Suit for Declaration of Joint Entitlement to Slum Rehabilitation Premises. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on jurisdiction, emphasi...