Search Results for "Central Government Authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Central Government Authority"

7471 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7471 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Settlement Application. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider detenu's pending settlement application under Customs Act and Central Excise Act before passing order.

27 Jul 2006

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Charles Patrick, challenged the detention order dated 5.5.2006 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Bypass Project. Court upholds acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for public purpose of laying bypass as part of State Highway, rejecting claims of lack of notice and public interest.

16 Jan 2015

The petitioners, owners of Gat No. 170 and Gat No. 169 in mouza Sagwan, Buldhana, challenged the acquisition of their land under the Land Acquisition ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointments Under RTI Act, 2005 — No Merit Found in Allegations of Irregularities in Selection of Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners.

20 Jul 2006

The petitioners, Janhit Manch and others, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the appointments of the Chief ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Orders Against IIT Bombay in Contract Labour Case — Principal Employer Liable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. IIT Bombay held liable for gratuity of contract labourers despite absence of direct employer-employee relationship, as the definition of 'employer' under Section 2(f) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 includes the person who has ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment.

4 Oct 2024

The Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (IIT Bombay) filed three writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Autho...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Power Developer in Mega Power Policy Customs Duty Exemption Dispute — Press Release Not a Binding Policy Change. The court held that a Press Release reducing the capacity threshold for Mega Power Projects from 1000 MW to 700 MW did not create a binding right to customs duty exemption under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the appellant had assumed the risk of policy changes under the RFP.

20 Nov 2024

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 30.06.2014, which dismissed the appeal of Nabha Power Limited...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Extensions of Retired Officers, Emphasizes Strict Adherence to Government Policy. The Court Interprets the Policy Exception 'No Other Alternative' Reasonably, Allowing Flexibility in Rare Cases While Directing Compliance with Office Memoranda.

14 Jun 2010

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by nine engineers employed in the Electricity Department of the Government of Goa, seeking a writ of mandamu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate of Education Cess on Exported Goods in Central Excise Matter — Education Cess Held to Be Part of Excise Duty for Rebate Purposes Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Section 37B of Central Excise Act, 1944.

29 Apr 2010

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one by M/s Ispat Industries Limited challenging an order dated 30 November 2004 passed by the Deputy Commiss...

High Court

High Court Quashes Central Government Order Requiring Mining Company to Stop Operations and Obtain Prior Approval Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Mining Lease Renewal Not Requiring Fresh Approval Under Section 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 as Lease Area Was Already Diverted for Non-Forest Use.

29 Apr 2025

The petitioner, The Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Limited, a mining company, challenged a communication dated 29 January 2014 issued by the Ministry ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Central Excise Appeal — No Power to Review Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944. Section 35L of the Act Bars Application of CPC Provisions on Review, Hence Review Petition Not Maintainable.

16 Dec 2010

The petitioner, VIP Industries Ltd., filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an earlier order that dismissed its applic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Amendment) Act, 1996. Petitioner Trade Unions Contend Amendment is Retrograde and Repugnant to Central Act, Requiring Presidential Assent.

10 Oct 2006

The Bombay High Court, in its Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, heard three writ petitions filed by trade unions namely Karantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sangh...

106 107 108 109 110

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)