Search Results for "evidentiary value"

1135 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1135 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Human Trafficking Case Under Section 6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. Minor Girls Rescued from Brothel, Evidence of Detention and Cruelty Established.

The case involves the conviction of Smt. Rita Dilip Ghosh (the applicant) under Section 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (PITA) for det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Property Partition Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as the court found no error in the judgment dated 7.9.2012 in RSA No.5985/2010 regarding share fixation.

The review petition was filed by the petitioners (legal representatives of the deceased original plaintiff) against the judgment dated 7.9.2012 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by NEKRTC in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation of Rs. 10,65,400 Upheld. Claimant Injured in Collision with Bus; Tribunal's Award Based on Proper Assessment of Injuries and Loss of Earning Capacity.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Managing Director of NEKRTC under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Injured Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The appellant, Arjuna Maruti Kazidoni, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, South Goa, Margao, in Sessions Case No.05/2020 for the murder o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Fact. The Court held that no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC as the findings of the courts below were based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the legal representatives of the original plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partially Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Claimant's Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Multiplier Applied as per Second Schedule of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by K.B. Shivakumar Swamy (claimant) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seek...