High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Property Partition Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as the court found no error in the judgment dated 7.9.2012 in RSA No.5985/2010 regarding share fixation.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The review petition was filed by the petitioners (legal representatives of the deceased original plaintiff) against the judgment dated 7.9.2012 passed by the High Court in RSA No.5985/2010. The second appeal had been disposed of reversing the order of the lower appellate court which had fixed a 1/4th share in respect of the share of the wife and her husband. The petitioners sought review of that judgment under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC. The High Court heard the learned counsel for both parties. The court observed that the review petition was filed against the judgment of the lower appellate court fixing 1/4th share, and that the second appeal had been disposed of reversing that order. The court found that the petitioners had not made out any ground for review as there was no error apparent on the face of the record. Consequently, the review petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Review - Error Apparent on Face of Record - Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The review petition challenged the judgment in RSA No.5985/2010 which reversed the lower appellate court's order fixing 1/4th share. The High Court held that no error apparent on the face of the record was made out and dismissed the review petition. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the judgment dated 7.9.2012 in RSA No.5985/2010 suffers from an error apparent on the face of the record warranting review under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The review petition is dismissed as no error apparent on the face of the record is made out.

Law Points

  • Review jurisdiction
  • Error apparent on face of record
  • Order 47 Rule 1 CPC
  • Section 114 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (09) 47

Review Petition No.1633/2012 in R.S.A.No.5985/2010

2014-09-02

Huluvadi G. Ramesh

Sri Srikant Patil (for petitioners), Sri M.G.Naganuri (for respondent)

Thabagouda Satteppa Umarani (since deceased, represented by LRs: Smt.Mahadevi, Smt.Neelawwa, Narasappa, Paragouda, Miss.Saraswati, Dundappa)

Satteppa S/o.Thabagouda Umarani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review petition against judgment in second appeal in a property partition suit.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought review and modification of the judgment dated 7.9.2012 in RSA No.5985/2010.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were aggrieved by the judgment of the lower appellate court fixing 1/4th share, which was reversed by the High Court in second appeal.

Previous Decisions

The lower appellate court had fixed 1/4th share; the High Court in RSA No.5985/2010 reversed that order.

Issues

Whether the judgment in RSA No.5985/2010 suffers from an error apparent on the face of the record.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned counsel for the petitioners argued for review; learned counsel for the respondent opposed.

Ratio Decidendi

A review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is maintainable only if there is an error apparent on the face of the record; mere disagreement with the judgment is not a ground for review.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. This review petition is filed against the judgment of the lower appellate Court fixing 1/4th share in respect of the share of wife and her husband. The second appeal has been disposed of by this Court reversing the order of the lower appellate Court. The petitioners have not made out any ground for review. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed.

Procedural History

The trial court passed a decree; the lower appellate court fixed 1/4th share; the High Court in RSA No.5985/2010 reversed the lower appellate court's order; the petitioners filed Review Petition No.1633/2012 against the judgment in RSA No.5985/2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 47 Rule 1, Section 114
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgaar Parishad Case Under UAP Act — No Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act or Conspiracy. Appellant's role as researcher and teacher not linked to violence; mere attendance at meetings a...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Property Partition Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as the court found no error in the judgment dated 7.9.2012 in RSA No.5985/2010 r...