CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005
12 Apr 2013The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...
Search Results for "dispute arising under contract"
3143 result(s) found
Found 3143 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Clause Validity Dispute Under Lease Agreement. The arbitration clause designating the lessee's Managing Director as sole arbitrator is upheld as valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, absent contravention of public policy.
1 Feb 2022The Supreme Court heard appeals by Indian Oil Corporation Limited against a judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute arose from a lease agreemen...
- 158
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Section 9 Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Foreign Investor in Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction to decide on interim measures does not preclude the court from granting interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, especially when the tribunal is not yet constituted.
29 Jan 2021The Appellant, Aniket SA Investments LLC, a foreign investor and shareholder in Respondent No. 1 (Janapriya Engineers Syndicate Private Limited), file...
- 104
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine Transaction. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to establish the execution and validity of the agreement to sell, and the suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
10 Sep 2015The appellant, Mr. Arjun M. Menda, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agai...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Partial Arbitral Award on Jurisdiction — Draft Joint Executing Agreement Held to be Concluded Contract with Valid Arbitration Clause. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's finding that the JEA was a concluded contract and the arbitration agreement was valid, subsisting and binding.
10 Jan 2019The petitioner, M3NERGY Sdn.Bhd., a Malaysian company, challenged a partial arbitral award passed by a three-member tribunal. The partial award dealt ...
- 132
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Arbitration Act Case - Trial Court Correctly Refused to Re-Examine Award Merits Under Section 17 After Section 30 Objections Dismissed in Default. Court holds that once objections under Section 30 are rejected, the court under Section 17 must pronounce judgment according to award without re-examining merits.
6 Feb 2018The appellant, Union of India, challenged the judgment and order dated 16.03.1998 passed by the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wardha in Misce...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications to Appoint Arbitrator in LLP and Trust Dispute Over School Management Agreements. Court Holds That Arbitration Clause in School Management Services Agreement Binds Non-Signatory Trust Due to Interconnected Agreements.
23 Dec 2022The judgment concerns two arbitration applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Edufocus International Edu...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Assistant Registrar under Bombay Moneylenders Act to Nullify Registered Sale Deeds. Multiple writ petitions challenge orders directing reconveyance of agricultural land alleged to be security for unlicensed money lending.
13 Oct 2006The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of 21 writ petitions collectively, all challenging orders passed by the Taluka Assistant Registr...
- 47
Supreme Court
Arbitration Law Explained: Supreme Court on Existence and Validity of Arbitration Agreement (2026 Judgment)
4 Feb 2026he case involved a dispute between the parties regarding the applicability and validity of an arbitration clause contained in the agreement. The High ...
- 524
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Order in Bank Guarantee Dispute. The court held that the Debt Recovery Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain claims for recovery of amounts due under bank guarantees, and the petitioner's challenge was without merit.
15 Sep 2017The petitioner, Gammon India Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 28th September 2...
- 86
